Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Feb;49(2):225-30.
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00451-7.

Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis

S M Donnellan et al. Urology. 1997 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess prospectively-using pad test and questionnaire-the rate and degree of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy, to analyze factors that may predispose individuals to postoperative incontinence, and to assess the impact of incontinence on patient lifestyle.

Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients were assessed at 3-month intervals for 1 year after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patients were objectively assessed using a 1-hour pad test and subjectively assessed by questionnaire. Incontinence was graded objectively according to the change in weight of the pad at 1 hour and subjectively by the number of pads used per day. Lifestyle modifications were assessed by questionnaire at 12 months. A number of variable factors were studied to assess risk factors for postoperative incontinence.

Results: Continence continued to improve up to 12 months. At 12 months, pad testing revealed 84% of patients were dry, 6% were mildly incontinent. 6% were moderately incontinent, and 4% were severely incontinent. Questionnaire assessment revealed 80% wore no pad, 14% had mild incontinence, 4% had moderate incontinence, and 2% had severe incontinence. Pad testing was not as sensitive as the questionnaire for the detection of minimal incontinence but was more reliable for moderate and severe levels. Patients made lifestyle changes proportional to the level of incontinence. No predisposing factor was identified for the development of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Conclusions: Significant incontinence after radical prostatectomy occurs in as many as 10% of patients. Pad testing provides an inexpensive and simple form of objective assessment in patients with bothersome incontinence and allows documentation of improvement over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources