Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Dec;72(6):422-6.
doi: 10.1136/sti.72.6.422.

Gonorrhoea in men: clinical and diagnostic aspects

Affiliations

Gonorrhoea in men: clinical and diagnostic aspects

J Sherrard et al. Genitourin Med. 1996 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: To review the features of gonococcal infection in men in the 1990s.

Methods: A retrospective study of all men with gonorrhoea presenting to an inner city department of genitourinary medicine in the years 1990 to 1992.

Results: 1749 cases of gonorrhoea were seen in 1382 men. A high incidence of gonorrhoea was found in attenders of African or Caribbean extraction. In 228 men with a known date of infection, the incubation period, a mean of 8.3 days, was longer than previously described. The mean infectious period was 12.0 days. By 14 days 86.2% of men had developed symptoms. Of 1615 men with urethral infection 81.9% complained of discharge, while dysuria occurred in 52.8%. Discharge with dysuria were present in only 48.1% of patients. In 10.2% episodes of urethral infection the patients had no symptoms referable to their gonorrhoea. Urethral gonorrhoea was diagnosed by microscopy in 94.4% of symptomatic men and in only 81.1% of asymptomatic men. Microscopy of rectal samples were positive in 46.4% of cases. In this population, a dose of 2 g of ampicillin with 1 g of probenecid gave a high cure rate of gonorrhoea as long as infection was not due to penicillinase-producing organisms.

Conclusions: These data suggest that the incubation and infectious period of urethral gonorrhoea has increased compared with previous studies and that symptoms have altered. Only 48.1% of men described the classical symptoms of discharge with dysuria. Microscopy of urethral smears remains useful in symptomatic men but is less sensitive in those without symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Vener Dis. 1977 Jun;53(3):180-3 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 23;298(8):428-35 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1978 Apr 8;1(8067):761-4 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 10;300(19):1074-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Vener Dis. 1980 Feb;56(1):26-30 - PubMed

MeSH terms