The role of upper limb segment rotations in the development of spin in the tennis forehand
- PMID: 9040900
The role of upper limb segment rotations in the development of spin in the tennis forehand
Abstract
Increased topspin in the tennis forehand is produced by maintaining a perpendicular racket-face to the court surface at impact and increasing the trajectory and vertical velocity of the racket-head. These modifications to stroke technique from those previously identified in the flat forehand drive are the result of changes to the movement patterns of the segments of the upper limb. The contributions that the upper limb segment's anatomical rotations make to racket-head velocity at impact depend on both their angular velocity and the instantaneous position of the racket with respect to these movements. Six high performance tennis players were filmed at a nominal rate of 200 Hz by three Photosonics cameras while hitting flat (no spin) and topspin groundstrokes and a forehand topspin lob. The three-dimensional (3-D) displacement histories of 16 selected landmarks were then calculated using the direct linear transformation approach and 3-D individual segment rotations for the upper limb were calculated using vector equations. Significant differences were recorded in the effect that the various segment rotations made to the x-direction (forward) and y-direction (upward) impact velocities of the racket-head. These differences were not reflected in the contributions to racket-head velocity when the absolute velocities were expressed relative to the impact velocity. Trunk rotation, upper arm flexion/abduction, upper arm internal rotation, hand palmar and ulnar flexion all played integral roles in producing impact racket speed.
Similar articles
-
The role of upper limb segment rotations in the development of racket-head speed in the squash forehand.J Sports Sci. 1996 Apr;14(2):159-65. doi: 10.1080/02640419608727697. J Sports Sci. 1996. PMID: 8737323
-
Contributions of upper limb rotations to racket velocity in table tennis backhands against topspin and backspin.J Sports Sci. 2008 Feb 1;26(3):287-93. doi: 10.1080/02640410701501705. J Sports Sci. 2008. PMID: 17934947
-
Correlations between Angular Velocities in Selected Joints and Velocity of Table Tennis Racket during Topspin Forehand and Backhand.J Sports Sci Med. 2018 May 14;17(2):330-338. eCollection 2018 Jun. J Sports Sci Med. 2018. PMID: 29769835 Free PMC article.
-
Long-axis rotation: the missing link in proximal-to-distal segmental sequencing.J Sports Sci. 2000 Apr;18(4):247-54. doi: 10.1080/026404100364983. J Sports Sci. 2000. PMID: 10824641 Review.
-
Effect of endpoint conditions on position and velocity near impact in tennis.J Sports Sci. 2001 Nov;19(11):839-44. doi: 10.1080/026404101753113787. J Sports Sci. 2001. PMID: 11695505 Review.
Cited by
-
Key factors and timing patterns in the tennis forehand of different skill levels.J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Dec 1;9(4):643-51. eCollection 2010. J Sports Sci Med. 2010. PMID: 24149792 Free PMC article.
-
Kinematic differences in forehand serve-receiving techniques of the male tennis players at low and high-speed serves.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77564-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39496757 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanics and learning practices associated with the tennis forehand: a review.J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Jun 1;12(2):225-31. J Sports Sci Med. 2013. PMID: 24149800 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Relationship between muscle coordination and racket mass during forehand drive in tennis.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Oct;107(3):289-98. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1124-4. Epub 2009 Jul 12. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009. PMID: 19597741
-
Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill.PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e104744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104744. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25140822 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.