Development of the California Consonant Test
- PMID: 904308
- DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2003.463
Development of the California Consonant Test
Abstract
A 100-item, multiple-choice test for consonant identification labeled the California Consonant Test (CCT) has been developed expressly for use with hearing-impaired patients. A computer-assisted analysis was obtained for the test responses of 550 patients with sensorineural hearing loss. The test seems highly sensitive to configurations of high-tone loss, but the correlation with degree of loss, especially in the instance of flat configurations, is somewhat low (-0.40). Test-retest correlation is 0.96. A correlation of 0.35 with a W-22 list indicates that the two tests are measuring different aspects of speech reception. In addition to its usefulness in identifying consonant confusions for rehabilitation purposes, the CCT may prove helpful in ranking hearing aids. For the latter purpose, two 50-item subforms, designed for equivalence, have been under observation for possible use when time is a critical factor. Repetitions of the 100-item list offer greater stability, however.
Similar articles
-
A critique of speech recognition testing preliminary to hearing therapy.J Speech Hear Disord. 1972 May;37(2):195-202. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3702.195. J Speech Hear Disord. 1972. PMID: 5027358 No abstract available.
-
Application of a high-frequency consonant discrimination word list in hearing-aid evaluation.J Speech Hear Disord. 1971 Aug;36(3):354-5. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3603.354. J Speech Hear Disord. 1971. PMID: 5566114 No abstract available.
-
A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions.J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Mar;21(1):5-36. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2101.05. J Speech Hear Res. 1978. PMID: 642487
-
[Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].HNO. 2017 Mar;65(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0291-y. HNO. 2017. PMID: 27921115 Review. German.
-
[Auditory rehabilitation path for children].Duodecim. 2011;127(8):819-25. Duodecim. 2011. PMID: 21568108 Review. Finnish.
Cited by
-
Toward a New Evidence-Based Fitting Paradigm for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.Am J Audiol. 2021 Mar 10;30(1):43-66. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00085. Epub 2020 Dec 1. Am J Audiol. 2021. PMID: 33264578 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.Semin Hear. 2018 Nov;39(4):377-389. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670700. Epub 2018 Oct 26. Semin Hear. 2018. PMID: 30374209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Masking Release in Children and Adults With Hearing Loss When Using Amplification.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Feb;59(1):110-21. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0105. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016. PMID: 26540194 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of low-pass filtering on the perception of word-final plurality markers in children and adults with normal hearing.Am J Audiol. 2014 Sep;23(3):351-8. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-14-0003. Am J Audiol. 2014. PMID: 25036654 Free PMC article.
-
Neurofeedback Training of Auditory Selective Attention Enhances Speech-In-Noise Perception.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 22;15:676992. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.676992. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34239430 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources