Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Feb;18(2):259-69.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015229.

The influence of muscle mass, strength, fatigability and blood flow on exercise capacity in cachectic and non-cachectic patients with chronic heart failure

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The influence of muscle mass, strength, fatigability and blood flow on exercise capacity in cachectic and non-cachectic patients with chronic heart failure

S D Anker et al. Eur Heart J. 1997 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The influence of age, skeletal muscle function and peripheral blood flow on exercise capacity in chronic heart failure patients is controversial, possibly due to variations in skeletal muscle atrophy.

Methods and results: To assess predictors of exercise capacity in patients with clinical cardiac cachexia, we studied 16 cachectic and 39 non-cachectic male chronic heart failure patients of similar age and ejection fraction. All cachectic patients were wasted (% ideal body weight: 81.2 +/- 1.9 vs 105.2 +/- 2.1, P < 0.0001, mean +/- SEM) and had documented weight loss (5-30 kg). Peak oxygen consumption (14.9 +/- 1.4 vs 16.3 +/- 0.6 ml.kg-1, min-1, resting and peak blood flow (plethysmography) and 20 min fatigability (% baseline strength) were all similar between the two groups. Quadriceps strength, muscle size (all P < 0.0001), strength per unit muscle (right: P < 0.05: left: P < 0.001) and 5 min fatigability (P < 0.05) were all lower in cachectic patients. In non-cachectic patients, age (R = 0.48) and quadriceps strength (R = 0.43, all P < 0.01) predicted peak oxygen consumption. Only in cachectic patients did peak blood flow predict peak oxygen consumption significantly (R = 0.72, P = 0.005), whereas age and strength did not. Similar findings were confirmed using other previously published definitions of cardiac cachexia.

Conclusions: The predictors of exercise capacity change with the development of cardiac cachexia from age and strength to peak blood flow. This shift may be caused by additional endocrine or catabolic, abnormalities active in end stage heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources