Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 May;62(5):153-64.

[Assessment of various new predictive parameters of the outcome of mechanical ventilation weaning]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 9045094
Clinical Trial

[Assessment of various new predictive parameters of the outcome of mechanical ventilation weaning]

[Article in Italian]
M Mergoni et al. Minerva Anestesiol. 1996 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate new indexes predicting weaning outcome from mechanical ventilation.

Experimental design: Prospective study with two main end-points: a comparison of weaning indexes between successful and unsuccessful groups and an evaluation of their predicting value.

Environment: Surgical-Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Patients: Patients ventilated for more than 72 hours and subjected to a weaning trial until spontaneous ventilation.

Measurements: Traditional weaning parameters [respiratory rate (fsb), expiratory minute volume (Vesb), Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)] along with the new indexes [fsb/Vtsb) (rate to tidal volume ratio), CROP index (Compliance Rate Oxygenation Pressure), P0.1/MIP, IEQ (Inspiratory Effort Quotient), WI (Weaning Index)] were measured before discontinuation of ventilation support.

Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between successful and unsuccessful groups for the following parameters: fsb, MIP, fsb/.Vtsb, CROP, Po.1/MIP and WI while no differences were observed for Vesb and IEQ. The sensitivity and specificity for the new indexes were respectively: fsb/Vtsb: 0.65 and 0.58; CROP: 0.70 and 0.63; P0.1/MIP: 0.85 and 0.36; WI: 0.69 and 0.47.

Conclusion: A statistically significant difference between successful and unsuccessful groups was observed for some but not all new indexes; the diagnostic accuracy of the new indexes were no better than additional parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources