Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;37(2):95-9.
doi: 10.1159/000117417.

Qualitative assessment of cerebral atrophy on MRI: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in dementia and normal aging

Affiliations

Qualitative assessment of cerebral atrophy on MRI: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in dementia and normal aging

P Scheltens et al. Eur Neurol. 1997.

Abstract

To assess the reproducibility of a qualitative rating scale of cerebral atrophy on MRI in an aged population of demented and non-demented individuals, 4 raters independently judged cerebral atrophy (CA) in 13 regions on a 0-3 scale on 75 MRI scans, on two occasions. The level of agreement was expressed by kappa statistics as well as by analysis of variance for interexaminer reproducibility studies. The mean CA scores ranged from 13.3 to 21.2, indicating moderately high prevalence of cerebral atrophy in this sample. Complete agreement among observers was reached in 49.7% of the ratings during the first assessment and in 44.1% in the second assessment. The inter-observer agreement was poor in both sessions (mean overall kappas 0.34 and 0.24). The intra-observer agreement was moderate to good for all raters (mean overall kappa: 0.58). The average standard deviation of the differences between CA scores of the 4 raters was 5.12 in the first and 5.13 in the second session. The average standard deviation for the differences within raters was 2.4. We conclude that the assessment of cerebral atrophy using this rating scale on MRI in an aged population has a poor reproducibility among raters. However, it provides regional atrophy measurements and is quite reliable when performed by a single rater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources