Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Mar;15(3):1052-62.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1052.

Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of high-dose interleukin-2 in combination with a soluble p75 tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoglobulin G chimera in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of high-dose interleukin-2 in combination with a soluble p75 tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoglobulin G chimera in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma

J S Du Bois et al. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to compare the toxicity and biologic effects of treatment with high-dose intravenous (IV) bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus the recombinant human soluble p75 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor immunoglobulin G (IgG) chimera (rhuTNFR:Fc) with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

Patients and methods: Twenty patients with advanced melanoma or renal cell carcinoma were randomized to receive IL-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hours on days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19 (maximum, 28 doses) combined with placebo or the rhuTNFR:Fc fusion protein (Immunex, Seattle, WA) 10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and 5 mg/m2 on days 3, 5, 17, and 19. The impact of rhuTNFR:Fc on IL-2 toxicity and biologic effects was evaluated.

Results: No clinically significant difference in toxicity was observed in the two treatment arms. The adjusted median number of IL-2 doses administered during cycle 1 was 24.5 (range, seven to 28) and 21.5 (range, five to 27) for the placebo and rhuTNFR:Fc arms, respectively (P = .544). IL-2-induced TNF bioactivity, neutrophil chemotactic defect, and serum IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) induction were suppressed by rhuTNFR:Fc. Two of nine assessable patients (22%) on IL-2/placebo and three of 10 patients (30%) on IL-2/rhuTNFR:Fc responded.

Conclusion: Despite evidence of in vitro neutralization of TNF functional activity and partial inhibition of other secondary biologic effects of IL-2, rhuTNFR:Fc does not reduce the clinical toxicity associated with high-dose IL-2 therapy. These results suggest that the toxicity and antitumor effects of IL-2 treatment are independent of circulating TNF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms