Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up
- PMID: 9062416
- PMCID: PMC2063387
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.161
Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up
Abstract
The aims of our study were to assess the effect of follow-up on the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients and to assess the attitudes of patients towards follow-up as a function of patient characteristics. Patients who had been treated with curative intent were selected from four types of hospitals. Eighty-two patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire, whereas 130 patients received the questionnaire by mail. To assess the effect of follow-up on the quality of life, the interviewed patients were randomly allocated to three groups and interviewed at different times in relation to the follow-up visit. Analysis did not show an effect of the follow-up visit on quality of life. Patients reported a positive attitude towards follow-up: it reassured them, they judged the communication with the physician to be positive, and they experienced only slight nervous anticipation and few other disadvantages. Patients reported a strong preference for follow-up, and a large majority would prefer follow-up even if it would not lead to earlier detection of a recurrence. Apart from living situation, no patient characteristics were clearly associated with the attitude towards follow-up. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Patients' views on follow up of colorectal cancer: implications for risk communication and decision making.Postgrad Med J. 2003 Jul;79(933):403-7. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.933.403. Postgrad Med J. 2003. PMID: 12897220 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of follow-up on health-related quality of life after radical surgery for colorectal cancer.Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 May;34(5):509-15. doi: 10.1080/003655299750026254. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999. PMID: 10423068
-
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112. JAMA Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26182303 Free PMC article.
-
[Quality of life assessments in colorectal surgery].Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Mar 3;170(10):853-5. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008. PMID: 18364172 Review. Danish.
-
Evaluating primary care follow-up of breast cancer: methods and preliminary results of three studies.Ann Oncol. 1995;6 Suppl 2:47-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/6.suppl_2.s47. Ann Oncol. 1995. PMID: 8547197 Review.
Cited by
-
Intensive or not surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer after curative resection.World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar 28;16(12):1427-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i12.1427. World J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20333780 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-led home-based follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer: the protocol of the prospective, multicentre FUTURE-primary implementation study.BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e074089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074089. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37827744 Free PMC article.
-
Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer.BMJ. 2004 Jan 10;328(7431):81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.81. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14715603 Free PMC article.
-
Role of oncologists and primary care physicians in providing follow-up care to non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors within 5 years of diagnosis: a population-based study.Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun;22(6):1509-17. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2113-z. Epub 2014 Jan 12. Support Care Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24414999
-
A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Oct;11(5):542-552. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0623-2. Epub 2017 Jun 22. J Cancer Surviv. 2017. PMID: 28639159 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical