Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women
- PMID: 9069134
- DOI: 10.1007/s004649900305
Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women
Abstract
Background: Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is most difficult in fertile-age women. In this patient group up to 50% of open appendectomies are negative for appendicitis. We conducted a randomized study to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in young female patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
Methods: Fifty female patients between the ages of 16 and 40 years presenting with acute right lower abdominal pain were randomized, 25 to laparoscopy and 25 to an open appendectomy. Diagnostic accuracy, rate of negative appendectomies, safety, and final outcome were compared in the two groups.
Results: Diagnosis was established in 96% of patients in the laparoscopic group and in 72% in the open group. There were 11 (44%) unnecessary appendectomies in the open group, but only one (4%) in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.0005).
Conclusions: In young women with right lower abdominal pain, laparoscopy can give precise diagnosis and reduce the rate of negative appendectomies.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study.Surg Endosc. 2001 Feb;15(2):200-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640000255. Surg Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11285968 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study.Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1146-52. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007. PMID: 17629058 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003. Arch Surg. 1997. PMID: 9230853 Clinical Trial.
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15095081 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial.Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):2987-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1160-5. Epub 2010 Jun 15. Surg Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20552369 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy: differences between male and female patients with suspected acute appendicitis.World J Surg. 2007 Feb;31(2):409-13. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0335-7. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17219281 Clinical Trial.
-
Early laparoscopy for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain: a critical appraisal of the evidence.Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):10-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1145-4. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20589513
-
Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):14-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0564-0. Epub 2005 Oct 24. Surg Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16247571 Review.
-
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 21047410 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical