Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Feb;145(2):383-94.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.383.

Characteristics and distribution of large tandem duplications in brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) mitochondrial DNA

Affiliations

Characteristics and distribution of large tandem duplications in brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) mitochondrial DNA

M H Gach et al. Genetics. 1997 Feb.

Abstract

Most animal mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNAs) range in size from 15 to 18 kb, but increased sizes up to approximately 40 kb are occasionally found. We investigated large size variation in mtDNA of the brook stickleback fish, Culaea inconstans, and characterized four large (2.7-5.8 kb) tandem duplications. Duplications differ in size, frequency of occurrence, and degree of associated heteroplasmy, but each includes the control region and one or more adjacent genes. Duplications are correlated with two mtDNA lineages sampled from 31 populations. L1 duplications (3.2-4.8 kb) were present in all lineage I individuals (n = 121, 19 populations); 53 fish were heteroplasmic due to variation in the copy number of a tandemly repeated 270-bp sequence within the duplicated region. In contrast, duplications, L2, L3, and L4 (2.7-5.8 kb) occurred in only 117 of 174 lineage II fish, in eight of 14 populations. Nine fish with L3 or L4 duplications were heteroplasmic, possessing some mtDNAs that lacked duplications (normal-length mtDNAs). Heteroplasmy in L2 was associated with a small variable region near the ND5 gene. Phylogenetic analysis of restriction sites in Culaea mtDNAs and haplotype-defining sequence differences present in both copies argue for multiple independent events that gave rise to three of the four duplications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cytogenetics. 1970;9(5):321-32 - PubMed
    1. Adv Genet. 1984;22:1-108 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1982 Apr;28(4):693-705 - PubMed
    1. Microbiol Rev. 1982 Jun;46(2):208-40 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):207-17 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances