Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Jan;166(1):30-5.
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015373.

[3D-CT angiography and duplex sonography compared to arteriography in carotid stenoses]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[3D-CT angiography and duplex sonography compared to arteriography in carotid stenoses]

[Article in German]
J Link et al. Rofo. 1997 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the value of 3D-CT angiography, duplex sonography in comparison to selective digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of carotid artery stenoses.

Methods: 30 patients with 51 stenoses of carotid artery underwent 3D-CT angiography, duplex sonography and angiography. Quantification of stenosis was determined according to the NASCET study and categorized into mild (0-29%), moderate (30-69%), severe (70-99%) and occluded (100%).

Results: The agreement of 3D-CT angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was 62% (r = 0.89; p < 0.0001) and of duplex sonography with DSA was 77% (r = 0.94; p < 0.0001). Both modalities underestimated one occlusion as stenosed. In the evaluation of moderate and severe stenoses 3D-CT angiography showed an agreement with DSA in 50% (duplex: 88%) and 55% (duplex: 89%) respectively and was inferior to duplex sonography.

Conclusion: 3D-CT angiography is inferior to duplex sonography in the evaluation of carotid stenosis and not useful as a screening or reference examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms