Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Mar 15;69(6):1119-26.
doi: 10.1021/ac960804q.

Effects of charge state on fragmentation pathways, dynamics, and activation energies of ubiquitin ions measured by blackbody infrared radiative dissociation

Affiliations

Effects of charge state on fragmentation pathways, dynamics, and activation energies of ubiquitin ions measured by blackbody infrared radiative dissociation

R A Jockusch et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

Blackbody infrared radiative dissociation spectra of the (M + 5H)5+ through (M + 11H)11+ ions of the protein ubiquitin (8.6 kDa) formed by electrospray ionization were measured in a Fourier-transform mass spectrometer. The 5+ ion dissociates exclusively by loss of water and/or ammonia, whereas the 11+ charge state dissociates only by formation of complementary y and b ions. These two processes are competitive for intermediate charge state ions, with the formation of y and b ions increasingly favored for the higher charge states. The y and b ions are formed by cleavage of the backbone amide bond on the C-terminal side of acidic residues exclusively, with cleavage adjacent to aspartic acid favored. Thermal unimolecular dissociation rate constants for the dissociation of each of these charge states were measured. From the temperature dependence of these rates, Arrhenius activation parameters in the rapid energy exchange limit are obtained. The activation energies (Ea) and preexponential factors (A) for the 5+, 8+, and 9+ ions are 1.2 eV and 10(12) s-1, respectively. These values for the 6+ and 7+ ions are 0.9-1.0 eV and 10(9) s-1, and those for the 10+ and 11+ ions are 1.6 eV and 10(16)-10(17) s-1. Thus, with the exception of the 5+ ion, the higher charge states of ubiquitin have larger dissociation activation energies than the lower charge states. The different A factors observed for production of y and b ions from different precursor charge states indicate that they are formed by different mechanisms, ranging from relatively complex rearrangements to direct bond cleavages. These results clearly demonstrate that the relative dissociation rates of large biomolecule ions by themselves are not necessarily a reliable indicator of their relative dissociation energies, even when similar fragment ions are formed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Blackbody infrared radiative dissociation spectra of the 6+ to 11+ charge states of ubiquitin (a–f, respectively) taken from the kinetic data. Temperature and reaction delay for each spectrum are (a) 6+, 145 °C, 90 s; (b) 7+, 170 °C, 140 s; (c) 8+, 161 °C, 240 s; (d) 9 +, 151 °C, 300 s; (e) 10+, 151 °C, 200 s (expansion of molecular ion at 156 °C with no reaction delay inset); and (f) 11+, 151 °C, 60 s.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data for the dissociation of ubiquitin (a) 7+ and (b) 11+ charge states fit to first-order kinetics at the temperatures indicated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Arrhenius plots for dissociation of the 5+ to 11+ charge states of ubiquitin over a temperature range of 134–202 °C.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Simplified reaction diagram for formation of complementary y and b ions from ubiquitin showing possible reaction pathways consistent with Arrhenius A factors of 109–1017 s−1.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, Wong SF, Whitehouse CM. Science. 1989;246:64–71. - PubMed
    2. Smith RD, Loo JA, Loo RRO, Busman M, Udseth HR. Mass Spectrom Rev. 1991;10:359–451.
    1. Hillenkamp F, Karas M, Beavis RC, Chait BT. Anal Chem. 1991. pp. 1193A–1203A. - PubMed
    1. Chen R, Cheng X, Mitchell DW, Hofstadler SA, Wu Q, Rockwood AL, Sherman MG, Smith RD. Anal Chem. 1995;67:1159–1163.
    1. O’Connor PB, Speir JP, Senko MW, Little DP, McLafferty FW. J Mass Spectrom. 1995;30:88–93.
    2. McLuckey SA, Habibi-Goudarzi S. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:12085–12095.
    3. Dongré AR, Somogyi A, Wysocki VH. J Mass Spectrom. 1996;31:339–350. - PubMed
    4. Hunt DF, Yates JR, III, Shabanowitz J, Winston S, Hauer CR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:6233–6237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huddleston MJ, Bean MF, Carr SA. Anal Chem. 1993;65:877–884. - PubMed

Publication types