Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;75(7):1084-7.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.185.

A segregation analysis of testicular cancer based on Norwegian and Swedish families

Affiliations
Free PMC article

A segregation analysis of testicular cancer based on Norwegian and Swedish families

K Heimdal et al. Br J Cancer. 1997.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Clustering of testicular cancer cases in families is well known, although the aetiology is not. We present the results of a segregation analysis performed with the algorithm Pointer on familial data on 978 Scandinavian patients with testicular cancer. The segregation analysis favoured the involvement of major gene effects over models incorporating solely polygenic effects in testicular cancer aetiology. Overall, a recessive model best fits the family observations with an estimated gene frequency of 3.8% and a lifetime risk for homozygous men of developing the disease of 43%. This implies that 7.6% of men in the general population will be carriers of the mutant allele and that 0.1% would be homozygote and are, therefore, at high risk of developing the cancer. The testicular cancer incidence has changed greatly during the last generation. Also, the lethality of the disease has changed because of the introduction of new therapy. As failure to take account of such time trends might lead to inappropriate evidence for a recessive model, the analyses were repeated under different assumptions. The analyses favoured a recessive model of inheritance under all assumptions tested. However, the assumptions underlying the analyses are complex and, as this is the first segregation analysis of testicular cancer, the results must be interpreted cautiously.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Hum Genet. 1991 Oct;55(Pt 4):291-9 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1993 May 7;260(5109):810-2 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Nov 2;86(21):1600-8 - PubMed
    1. Hum Hered. 1995 Jan-Feb;45(1):41-8 - PubMed
    1. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Sep;4(9):1551-5 - PubMed

Publication types