Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Mar 15;11(4):477-83.
doi: 10.1097/00002030-199704000-00011.

Reductions in HIV-1 disease progression for zidovudine/lamivudine relative to control treatments: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Reductions in HIV-1 disease progression for zidovudine/lamivudine relative to control treatments: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

S Staszewski et al. AIDS. .

Abstract

Objectives: Four randomized double-blind trials have demonstrated that zidovudine/lamivudine (ZDV/3TC) reduces HIV RNA and raises CD4 counts relative to control treatments (ZDV or ZDV/zalcitabine (ddC)]. A meta-analysis of the clinical events in these trails was conducted to determine whether treatment with ZDV/3TC was also associated with a clinical benefit.

Design: The four trials, ZDV/3TC versus ZDV (NUCA3001, NUCB3001, NUCB3002) or versus ZDV/ddC (NUCA3002), were run concurrently, using the same doses of ZDV and 3TC.

Setting: Investigational sites in Europe and North America.

Patients: The trials recruited 972 HIV-1-positive, male and female patients aged > or = 18 years, with CD4 counts of 100-500 cells x 10(6)I. Two trials were for ZDV-naive patients and two were for ZDV pre-treated patients.

Main outcome measures: Progression to first new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) B or C event was compared between all ZDV/3TC arms and all control (ZDV, ZDV/ddC) arms.

Results: A total of 118 patients progressed to a first new CDC B/C event during the four trials, while 28 progressed to a new CDC event. Meta-analysis of the trials showed a 49% reduction in progression to new CDC B/C events (relative risk, 0.509; 95% confidence interval, 0.365-0.710; P < 0.0001) and a 66% reduction in progression to new CDC C events (relative risk, 0.344; 95% confidence interval, 0.169-0.700; P = 0.003) for the ZDV/3TC patients relative to the control patients. Reductions in progression to CDC B/C disease were seen in subgroups of naive and pre-treated patients, those with high and low CD4 counts and symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Conclusions: ZDV/3TC combination treatment delays the progression of CDC B/C disease compared with control treatments. In view of the low incidence of CDC C events, the results for progression to CDC C disease should be interpreted with caution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by