Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children
- PMID: 9107375
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0111:CCOCID>2.3.CO;2
Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children
Abstract
A comparison of dentoskeletal morphology in 347 Class II division 1 and 156 Class II division 2 malocclusions was performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs. Children at the ages of 8-10 years and 11-13 years were evaluated. The results of the study revealed broad variations in the variables analyzed. Skeletal Class II and Class III as well as hypo- and hyperdivergent maxillary/mandibular jaw base relationships were seen in both malocclusion samples. Noteworthy was the high frequency of cases with mandibular retrusion (Class II division 1 sample: 48% of the younger and 29% of the older subjects; Class II division 2 sample: 48% of the younger and 49% of the older subjects) and a short lower face (97%-100%). In conclusion it can be said that, except for the position of the maxillary incisors, no basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology exists between Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions.
Comment in
-
Class II division 2 skeletal pattern.Angle Orthod. 1998 Apr;68(2):104. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0104:CIDSP>2.3.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1998. PMID: 9564418 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.Eur J Orthod. 2006 Apr;28(2):179-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji096. Epub 2006 Jan 23. Eur J Orthod. 2006. PMID: 16431898
-
Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):459-65. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0459:TSDAAP]2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2006. PMID: 16637727
-
Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.World J Orthod. 2009 Spring;10(1):7-15. World J Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19388427
-
Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion?Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):49-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0049:CIMMRO>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1995. PMID: 7726463 Review.
-
Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age.Angle Orthod. 1981 Jul;51(3):177-202. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0177:COCIMI>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1981. PMID: 7023290 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic features of Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;5(6):513-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.170528. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015. PMID: 26759807 Free PMC article.
-
Does Appliance Design Affect Treatment Outcomes of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion? A Two-Center Retrospective Study.J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021 Jun 30;12(2):e4. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2021.12204. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021. PMID: 34377381 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular dimensions after early correction of the maxillary arch form in patients with Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion.Korean J Orthod. 2015 May;45(3):121-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.121. Epub 2015 May 15. Korean J Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26023540 Free PMC article.
-
Craniofacial characteristics of Syrian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study.PeerJ. 2020 Jul 15;8:e9545. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9545. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 32742806 Free PMC article.
-
Substantial Improvements in Facial Morphology through Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 3;58(8):1043. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081043. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36013510 Free PMC article. Review.