Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1997 Apr;20(4):315-28.
doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00007-0.

Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture

Affiliations
Review

Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture

A Odgaard. Bone. 1997 Apr.

Abstract

Recent development in three-dimensional (3-D) imaging of cancellous bone has made possible true 3-D quantification of trabecular architecture. This provides a significant improvement of the tools available for studying and understanding the mechanical functions of cancellous bone. This article reviews the different techniques for 3-D imaging, which include serial sectioning, X-ray tomographic methods, and NMR scanning. Basic architectural features of cancellous bone are discussed, and it is argued that connectivity and architectural anisotropy (fabric) are of special interest in mechanics-architecture relations. A full characterization of elastic mechanical properties is, with traditional mechanical testing, virtually impossible, but 3-D reconstruction in combination with newly developed methods for large-scale finite element analysis allow calculations of all elastic properties at the cancellous bone continuum level. Connectivity has traditionally been approached by various 2-D methods, but none of these methods have any known relation to 3-D connectivity. A topological approach allows unbiased quantification of connectivity, and this further allows expressions of the mean size of individual trabeculae, which has previously also been approached by a number of uncertain 2-D methods. Anisotropy may be quantified by fundamentally different methods. The well-known mean intercept length method is an interface-based method, whereas the volume orientation method is representative of volume-based methods. Recent studies indicate that volume-based methods are at least as good as interface-based methods in predicting mechanical anisotropy. Any other architectural property may be quantified from 3-D reconstructions of cancellous bone specimens as long as an explicit definition of the property can be given. This challenges intuitive and vaguely defined architectural properties and forces bone scientists toward 3-D thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer