Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by non-specialist surgeons
- PMID: 9117304
Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by non-specialist surgeons
Abstract
Background: Some authorities recommend that colorectal cancer should be treated in specialist units but evidence that non-specialist units demonstrate comparatively poor results may be lacking.
Methods: Between 1987 and 1991, 267 patients were operated on by four general surgeons, none of whom was a specialist in colorectal surgery. Procedure-related complications, postoperative mortality and disease-related survival rates were analysed.
Results: There were four cases of intraperitoneal sepsis (1 per cent) and five of 189 patients (3 per cent) had clinical anastomotic dehiscence; there was no case of wound dehiscence. The postoperative mortality rate after elective and emergency surgery was 2 and 13 per cent respectively. The 5-year disease-related survival rate for curative and palliative surgery was 67 and 9 per cent respectively. There were no significant differences between the surgeons.
Conclusion: Disease-related variables such as early-stage disease and fewer patients presenting as emergencies may have a greater favourable influence on ultimate survival than surgeon-related variables.
Similar articles
-
Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival.Br J Surg. 2004 May;91(5):605-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4456. Br J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15122613
-
Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Colorectal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit.Br J Surg. 1997 Dec;84(12):1731-6. Br J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9448628
-
Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):880-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5721. Br J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17410637
-
[Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Nov 15;127(22):2946-9. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007. PMID: 18026242 Review. Norwegian.
-
Surgical specialization and training - its relation to clinical outcome for colorectal cancer surgery.J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01525.x. Epub 2010 Aug 4. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 20704632 Review.
Cited by
-
Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?World J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;9(5):961-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i5.961. World J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12717838 Free PMC article.
-
Gastrointestinal surgery in old age: issues of equality and quality.Gut. 1997 Oct;41(4):427-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.4.427. Gut. 1997. PMID: 9391236 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before colorectal surgery: A randomized prospective trial in a tertiary care institute.J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014 Jul;5(2):421-4. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.136214. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014. PMID: 25097427 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients.Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 23;95(8):979-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603372. Br J Cancer. 2006. PMID: 17047646 Free PMC article.
-
Anastomotic leaks after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer: survey of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery.Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0407-9. Epub 2008 Jun 10. Tech Coloproctol. 2008. PMID: 18545882
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical