Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis
- PMID: 9118051
Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis
Abstract
Background: Long term intravenous access is a common requirement for cancer patients. This analysis was designed to determine device-related morbidity and factors predictive of poor long term outcome for patients with subcutaneous single lumen intravenous access ports.
Methods: Six hundred eighty patients who underwent subcutaneous intravenous port placement between June 1987 and May 1989 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were followed prospectively until port removal, death, or a maximum of 1960 days. Indications for and circumstances of placement, patient diagnoses, patient demographics, and subsequent courses of treatment were recorded, as well as technical and microbiologic device-related complications. Total, device specific, and complication free device durations were calculated.
Results: The median patient age was 52.4 years (range, 1.6-83.9 years). The female-to-male ratio was 1.5 to 1. Cancer diagnoses included solid organ tumors (84%), leukemia (4%), lymphoma (11%), and others (1%). Indications included access for systemic chemotherapy (98%), total parenteral nutrition (0.5%), and others (1.5%). One insertion complication and six insertion failures occurred, without mortality. The estimated mean overall actuarial device specific duration was 1191 days (range, 2-1960 days). Actuarial mean complication free, device specific duration was 952 days. Complications included sepsis (n = 31; 4.4%), site infection (n = 31; 4.4%), and accessibility failures such as thrombosis and leakage (n = 40, 5.7%). Reasons for end of port duration were patient death (72.4%), end of treatment (13.5%), functional failure or intractable infection (11.2%), and others (2.9%). Independent factors correlating with decreased port specific, complication free duration included placement site, age, tumor type, and catheter tip position.
Conclusions: Subcutaneous intravenous access ports in cancer patients are safe and well tolerated. Long term device duration is primarily influenced by patient survival. In this study, 90% of patients alive at 1 year and 70% of patients alive at 4 years had a functional port.
Similar articles
-
Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0071-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001. PMID: 11907746
-
Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Dec;83(3):533-6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6433. Gynecol Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11733967
-
Transcutaneously tunneled central venous lines in cancer patients: an analysis of device-related morbidity factors based on prospective data collection.Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Jul;7(6):441-9. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0441-y. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10894140
-
The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients.Eur J Surg. 1993 Jun-Jul;159(6-7):323-7. Eur J Surg. 1993. PMID: 8104491 Review.
-
[Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude].Chirurg. 1995 Mar;66(3):202-7. Chirurg. 1995. PMID: 7750390 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized and critically ill patients: a nationwide population-based study.BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 4;10:151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-151. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20525332 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):985-993. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12791. In Vivo. 2022. PMID: 35241560 Free PMC article.
-
Morbidity-mortality conference for adverse events associated with totally implanted venous access for cancer chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Apr;24(4):1857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2969-1. Epub 2015 Oct 10. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26454864
-
Complete caval thrombosis secondary to an implanted venous port--a case study.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Jan;105(1-2):18-21. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0018. Epub 2008 Jan 7. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008. PMID: 19578449 Free PMC article.
-
Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2333-44. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0981-2. Epub 2008 May 6. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18458909 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical