Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability
- PMID: 9118518
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1497
Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability
Abstract
Background: A patient-specific measure of defibrillation efficacy that requires a minimum number of ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes would be valuable for programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock strength at or above which VF is not induced when a stimulus is delivered during the vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle. It correlates with the defibrillation threshold (DFT) and can be determined with a single episode of VF. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ICDs programmed on the basis of the ULV convert spontaneous ICD-detected VF reliably.
Methods and results: We studied 100 consecutive patients at ICD implantation and during follow-up of 20 +/- 7 months. At implantation, the ULV and DFT were determined, and the ICD system was tested at a shock strength equal to the ULV + 3 J. During follow-up, the strength of the first shock was programmed to the ULV + 5 J for arrhythmias detected in the VF zone (cycle length < 292 +/- 17 ms). We reviewed stored detection intervals and electrograms from spontaneous episodes of ICD-detected VF to determine the success rate for appropriate first shocks. The programmed first-shock strength was 17.5 +/- 5.2 J. During follow-up, there were 120 appropriate first shocks in 37 patients. The arrhythmia was rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 70% of episodes (31 patients), VF in 11% (13 patients), polymorphic VT in 1%, and unclassified in 17% (15 patients). The first shock was successful in 119 of 120 episodes (99%; 95% CI, 93% to 100%). One unclassified episode required two shocks. No patient had syncope associated with an ICD shock or arrhythmic death.
Conclusions: ICD shocks can be programmed on the basis of the ULV, a measurement made in regular rhythm, without a direct measure of defibrillation efficacy.
Similar articles
-
Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):71-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1022304417889. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12652181
-
Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1009825731592. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999. PMID: 10387143
-
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17470697 Clinical Trial.
-
Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;30(2):258-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00659.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17338725 Review.
-
The dilemma of ICD implant testing.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00730.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17461879 Review.
Cited by
-
ICD Shock, Not Ventricular Fibrillation, Causes Elevation of High Sensitive Troponin T after Defibrillation Threshold Testing--The Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre TropShock-Trial.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0131570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131570. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26208329 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical