Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Dec;40(12):2848-53.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.12.2848.

Resistance to amikacin and isepamicin in rabbits with experimental endocarditis of an aac(6')-Ib-bearing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae susceptible in vitro

Affiliations

Resistance to amikacin and isepamicin in rabbits with experimental endocarditis of an aac(6')-Ib-bearing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae susceptible in vitro

E Caulin et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Dec.

Abstract

The effect of production of the aminoglycoside 6'-N-acetyltransferase [AAC(6')-IB] in Klebsiella pneumoniae on the outcome of amikacin and isepamicin treatment of rabbits with experimental endocarditis was assessed. Isogenic high-level (Hi) and low-level (Lo) AAC(6')-Ib-producing transconjugants (T) were constructed from clinical isolates with plasmid-borne resistance determinants. The MICs of amikacin and isepamicin, their bactericidal effects, and AAC(6')-Ib production appeared to be well correlated among the clinical isolates and the transconjugants. The susceptibility data determined in vitro, with MICs (in micrograms per milliliter) of amikacin and isepamicin for LoT and HiT of 4 and 0.5 and 32 and 8, respectively, were, however, not predictive of the in vivo efficacies of the drugs. While amikacin and isepamicin caused reductions in bacterial densities (log10 CFU per gram of cardiac vegetation) of 5.1 and 4.8 of the fully susceptible recipient strain (MICs of amikacin and isepamicin, 0.5 and 0.25, respectively), the reductions in density of both LoT and HiT caused by the two drugs (2.7 and 2.4 and 2.9 and 2.2, respectively) were only marginally significant, if at all. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) when the reductions in density of LoT and HiT by either drug were compared or when the efficacies of the two drugs in reducing the density of any strain [non-AAC(6')-producing, LoT, or HiT] were compared (P > 0.5). It is concluded that AAC(6')-Ib in K.pneumoniae, even when produced at a low level and not conferring resistance to amikacin and isepamicin in vitro, compromises the efficacies of both drugs in vivo and possibly does so beyond the experimental model studied here.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Infect Dis. 1994 Jun;169(6):1318-24 - PubMed
    1. Microbiol Rev. 1993 Mar;57(1):138-63 - PubMed
    1. Yale J Biol Med. 1971 Oct;44(2):206-13 - PubMed
    1. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1978 Jul;31(7):688-96 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1978;32:469-518 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms