Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996;7(5):260-3.
doi: 10.1007/BF01901248.

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of inpatient versus outpatient continence programs in the treatment of urinary incontinence in the female

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of inpatient versus outpatient continence programs in the treatment of urinary incontinence in the female

I N Ramsay et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996.

Abstract

Seventy-four patients presenting with a mixed pattern of urinary symptoms were randomly allocated to undergo either inpatient or outpatient continence programs as initial treatment, without prior urodynamic investigation. Both programs consisted of physiotherapy, bladder retraining, fluid normalization, dietary advice and general support and advice. Nine out of 39 in the outpatient group and 8 out of the 35 of the inpatient group failed to complete the study. There was a significant decrease in frequency, nocturia, number of incontinent episodes and visual analog scores for both groups. In addition the outpatients had a significant reduction in loss on pad testing, and a significantly greater improvement in their visual analog score. In each group 63% were cured or improved to the extent that they did not require further treatment. Staff costs per outpatient were half those for an inpatient. We conclude that outpatient conservative treatment as detailed above is a successful first-line treatment of urinary incontinence in women. It is as successful and possibly better than inpatient treatment, and is significantly cheaper.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1992 May;47(5):322-31 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1980 Dec;52(6):463-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Jun;94(6):575-82 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1993 Mar 27;306(6881):832-4 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Jun;95(6):602-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources