[Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction using an automated contour tracking method: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography]
- PMID: 9127839
[Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction using an automated contour tracking method: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography]
Abstract
A recently developed contour tracking method provides automated edge detection of left ventricular endocardium without a region of interest. The accuracy of this automated contour tracking (ACT) method in the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed in 20 patients (16 males and 4 females, mean age 58 years) using both the ACT method and equilibrium radionuclide angiography. Ejection fractions measured by the ACT method correlated well with those measured by equilibrium radionuclide angiography (y = 0.8x + 11.9, r = 0.91, SEE = 4.0%, p < 0.01). The ACT method provides an accurate estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction.
Similar articles
-
[Measurement of left ventricular filling by automated contour tracking method in echocardiography: comparison with radionuclide ventriculography].J Cardiol. 1999 Oct;34(4):207-10. J Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10553537 Japanese.
-
[Determination of ejection fraction and left ventricular fraction using isotopic ventriculography and bidimensional echocardiography. Comparison with contrast ventriculography].Rev Esp Cardiol. 1998;51 Suppl 1:10-8. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9549395 Spanish.
-
Correspondence of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 15;25(4):937-42. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00506-L. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995. PMID: 7884101
-
[Evaluation of cardiac function by radioisotope angiography].J Cardiol. 2000 Mar;35 Suppl 1:43-9. J Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10834169 Review. Japanese.
-
Determination of ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison of available imaging methods. The Cardiovascular Imaging Working Group.Mayo Clin Proc. 1997 Sep;72(9):860-70. doi: 10.4065/72.9.860. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997. PMID: 9294535 Review.