Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 May;78(1):179-89.
doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00562-3.

Visual, somatosensory, auditory and nociceptive modality properties in the feline suprageniculate nucleus

Affiliations

Visual, somatosensory, auditory and nociceptive modality properties in the feline suprageniculate nucleus

G Benedek et al. Neuroscience. 1997 May.

Abstract

Response properties of 252 single-units to visual, auditory, somatosensory and noxious stimulation were recorded by means of extracellular microelectrodes in the suprageniculate nucleus of anaesthetized, immobilized cats. Of the 141 units tested for modality properties the majority (n=113, 80.1%) was found unimodal in the sense that stimuli of exclusively one sensory modality were able to elicit an activation of the unit. Twenty-four (17.0%) cells were bimodal and four (2.8%) were trimodal (visual, somatosensory and auditory). The visual modality dominated the unimodal cells (n=74, 65.5%), while cells responsive to somatic stimulation (n=20, 17.6%), auditory stimulation (n=16, 14.1%) or noxious stimulation of the tooth pulp (n=3, 2.6%) were less frequently encountered. Visual sensitivity dominated the multisensory cells, too. The visually responsive units were characterized by having a sensitivity to stimuli moving in a rather large, uniform receptive field that covered the contralateral lower quadrant, and encompassed a flanking area of about 20 degree width in both the upper contralateral and lower ipsilateral visual fields. Many cells (n=52, 47%) were sensitive to the direction of the stimulation and reacted to stimuli moving at a high velocity (20-200 deg/s). Most cells responded differently to stimuli of a variety of sizes. Somatosensory units reacted to stimuli presented over a wide area on the contralateral side of the body, thus showing no sign of somatotopic organization. The auditory sensitivity fell within a wide range of acoustic stimuli in extremely large auditory receptive fields. The physiological properties of suprageniculate nucleus cells strongly resemble the sensory properties of cells found along the ventral bank of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus and the deeper layers of the superior colliculus. Our results provide further support for the notion of a separate tecto-suprageniculate-anterior ectosylvian sulcus/insular pathway that takes part in the processing of multimodal signals important for various types of sensory related behaviours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources