Clinical significance of cytogenetic findings in solid tumors

Abstract

Chromosome analysis of solid tumors is becoming an increasingly useful tool to help establish a correct diagnosis and to provide prognostically important information. Characteristic karyotypic patterns in terms of degree of cytogenetic complexity and type of nonrandom abnormalities may help to distinguish neoplasia from a nonneoplastic lesion and to differentiate between a benign and a malignant tumor. More importantly, the presence of a specific or pathognomonic change may confirm or refute a suspected diagnosis, provide an alternative, unsuspected diagnosis, and trace the origin of a metastasis. Presently, specific cytogenetic abnormalities may be of substantial, and sometimes decisive, help in four groups of differential diagnostic dilemmas: (1) Benign vs. malignant epithelial tumors of the kidney, thyroid gland, salivary glands, and ovary; (2) Benign vs. malignant mesenchymal tumors of adipose and muscle tissue; (3) Differentiation between various malignant bone and soft tissue tumors: and (4) Diagnosis of undifferentiated small-cell round-cell tumors. In addition to the diagnostic value, karyotypic findings may provide prognostic information. Thus, the presence of an abnormal clone and/or complex rearrangements is a poor prognostic sign in, e.g., carcinomas of the ovary, prostate, bladder, colon, and pancreas. Furthermore, characteristic cytogenetic aberrations are now known to be valuable prognostic parameters in malignant melanoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, germ cell tumors, neuroblastoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Many of the correlation analyses are preliminary, but they all point in the same direction, namely that cytogenetic studies will soon play the same essential role in the management of patients with solid tumors as they do today in hematologic oncology.