Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101
- PMID: 9145265
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00398.x
Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101
Abstract
Wondering why Amerchol L-101 (containing wool wax alcohols obtained from the hydrolysis of wool fat) appears as a test material (100%) in a cosmetics series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics AB), as wool wax alcohols were already tested in the European standard series, we added Amerchol L-101 (100%) systematically to the standard series. From 8 April 1991 to 28 February 1992, a total of 393 patients were tested: 3.05% (n = 12) showed positive test results (+, +2, +3) for wool wax alcohols as well as Amerchol L-101 (100%), 0.3% (n = 1) for wool wax alcohols only, and 11.1% (n = 44) for Amerchol L-101 (100%) only. Thus, the positive tests for Amerchol L-101 (100%) had a higher frequency of 3.4 compared to those for wool wax alcohols. In the meantime, we also added Amerchol L-101 50% (Trolab) to the standard series. Of all patients tested (n = 223) 2.7% (n = 6) had positive reactions to wool wax alcohols and 12.1% (n = 27) to Amerchol L-101 100% and/or 50%. Thus, positive reactions to Amerchol L-101 (100% and 50%) were 4.5 higher, whereas the rate of concordancy decreased. It is remarkable that 8 patients only had a positive reaction to Amerchol L-101 50% and 9 only to Amerchol L-101 100%. It seems that we miss many diagnoses in contact allergy by using only the standard wool wax alcohols test (30%).
Similar articles
-
Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101.Contact Dermatitis. 2019 May;80(5):298-303. doi: 10.1111/cod.13210. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Contact Dermatitis. 2019. PMID: 30624788 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Jan;84(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/cod.13689. Epub 2020 Oct 5. Contact Dermatitis. 2021. PMID: 32844454 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Contact sensitization to lanolin alcohols and Amerchol® L101 - analysis of IVDK data.Contact Dermatitis. 2018 May;78(5):367-369. doi: 10.1111/cod.12952. Contact Dermatitis. 2018. PMID: 29611262 No abstract available.
-
The myth of lanolin allergy.Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Sep;39(3):103-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05856.x. Contact Dermatitis. 1998. PMID: 9771981 Review.
-
The lanolin paradox.Dermatology. 1996;192(3):198-202. doi: 10.1159/000246365. Dermatology. 1996. PMID: 8726630 Review.
Cited by
-
Hypersensitivity to Lanolin: An Old-New Problem.Life (Basel). 2024 Nov 26;14(12):1553. doi: 10.3390/life14121553. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39768261 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101.Contact Dermatitis. 2019 May;80(5):298-303. doi: 10.1111/cod.13210. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Contact Dermatitis. 2019. PMID: 30624788 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Jan;84(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/cod.13689. Epub 2020 Oct 5. Contact Dermatitis. 2021. PMID: 32844454 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Review on Metabolic Paradoxes and their Impact on Metabolism.Arch Razi Inst. 2022 Jun 30;77(3):929-941. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2021.356277.1815. eCollection 2022 Jun. Arch Razi Inst. 2022. PMID: 36618306 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigating the role of allergic contact dermatitis in residual ocular surface disease on dupilumab (ROSDD),.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019 Nov 7;5(5):308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.10.001. eCollection 2019 Dec. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 31909149 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous