Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration
- PMID: 9146387
- PMCID: PMC2126525
Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration
Abstract
Objectives: To define the characteristics and determine the effectiveness of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care compared with conventional care in reducing death, dependency, and the requirement for long term institutional care after stroke.
Design: Systematic review of all randomised trials which compared organised inpatient stroke care with the contemporary conventional care. Specialist stroke unit interventions were defined as either a ward or team exclusively managing stroke (dedicated stroke unit) or a ward or team specialising in the management of disabling illnesses, which include stroke (mixed assessment/rehabilitation unit). Conventional care was usually provided in a general medical ward.
Setting: 19 trials (of which three had two treatment arms). 12 trials randomised a total of 2060 patients to a dedicated stroke unit or a general medical ward, six trials (647 patients) compared a mixed assessment/rehabilitation unit with a general medical ward, and four trials (542 patients) compared a dedicated stroke unit with a mixed assessment/rehabilitation unit.
Main outcome measures: Death, institutionalisation, and dependency.
Results: Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care, when compared with conventional care, was best characterised by coordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation, programmes of education and training in stroke, and specialisation of medical and nursing staff. The stroke unit care was usually housed in a geographically discrete ward. Stroke unit care was associated with a long term (median one year follow up) reduction of death (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.98; P < 0.05) and of the combined poor outcomes of death or dependency (0.69, 0.59 to 0.82; P < 0.0001) and death or institutionalisation (0.75, 0.65 to 0.87; P < 0.0001). Beneficial effects were independent of patients' age, sex, or stroke severity and of variations in stroke unit organisation. Length of stay in a hospital or institution was reduced by 8% (95% confidence interval 3% to 13%) compared with conventional care but there was considerable heterogeneity of results.
Conclusions: Organised stroke unit care resulted in long term reductions in death, dependency, and the need for institutional care. The observed benefits were not restricted to any particular subgroup of patients or model of stroke unit care. No systematic increase in the use of resources (in terms of length of stay) was apparent.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1997 Nov-Dec;127(3):61
-
Study confirms results of systematic review of care in stroke unit.BMJ. 1997 Oct 4;315(7112):881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7112.881. BMJ. 1997. PMID: 9353517 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A randomised controlled comparison of alternative strategies in stroke care.Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(18):iii-iv, 1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta9180. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15890138 Clinical Trial.
-
[The cerebrovascular stroke unit: the concept and its utility].Acta Med Port. 1997 Aug-Sep;10(8-9):551-5. Acta Med Port. 1997. PMID: 9446472 Portuguese.
-
[Effectiveness of special stroke units in treatment of acute stroke].Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2000 Apr;33(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s003910050165. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2000. PMID: 10851707 German.
-
How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration.Stroke. 1997 Nov;28(11):2139-44. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.11.2139. Stroke. 1997. PMID: 9368554
-
Comprehensive stroke units: a review of comparative evidence and experience.Int J Stroke. 2013 Jun;8(4):260-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00850.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19. Int J Stroke. 2013. PMID: 22813237 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of stroke-related risk factors in Albania: a single-center experience.Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2023 Dec 30;8:e123-e127. doi: 10.5114/amsad/176811. eCollection 2023. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2023. PMID: 38283926 Free PMC article.
-
Immunosenescence in neurocritical care.J Intensive Care. 2018 Oct 12;6:65. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0333-5. eCollection 2018. J Intensive Care. 2018. PMID: 30349725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of life as an instrument for need assessment and outcome assessment of health care in chronic patients.Qual Health Care. 1999 Dec;8(4):247-52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.4.247. Qual Health Care. 1999. PMID: 10847887 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cerebral haemorrhage as the presenting feature of myeloproliferative disorder.BMJ Case Rep. 2009;2009:bcr08.2008.0720. doi: 10.1136/bcr.08.2008.0720. Epub 2009 Mar 26. BMJ Case Rep. 2009. PMID: 21686662 Free PMC article.
-
Availability of Hospital Resources and Specialty Services for Stroke Care in North Carolina.South Med J. 2019 Jun;112(6):331-337. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000986. South Med J. 2019. PMID: 31158888 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources