Transformations to additivity in measurement error models
- PMID: 9147595
Transformations to additivity in measurement error models
Abstract
In many problems, one wants to model the relationship between a response Y and a covariate X. Sometimes it is difficult, expensive, or even impossible to observe X directly, but one can instead observe a substitute variable W that is easier to obtain. By far, the most common model for the relationship between the actual covariate of interest X and the substitute W is W = X + U, where the variable U represents measurement error. This assumption of additive measurement error may be unreasonable for certain data sets. We propose a new model, namely h(W) = h(X) + U, where h(.) is a monotone transformation function selected from some family H of monotone functions. The idea of the new model is that, in the correct scale, measurement error is additive. We propose two possible transformation families H. One is based on selecting a transformation that makes the within-sample mean and standard deviation of replicated W's uncorrelated. The second is based on selecting the transformation so that the errors (U's) fit a prespecified distribution. Transformation families used are the parametric power transformations and a cubic spline family. Several data examples are presented to illustrate the methods.
Similar articles
-
Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.Biometrics. 1997 Jun;53(2):395-409. Biometrics. 1997. PMID: 9192443
-
Measurement error in covariates in the marginal hazards model for multivariate failure time data.Biometrics. 2004 Dec;60(4):987-96. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00254.x. Biometrics. 2004. PMID: 15606419
-
Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.Biometrics. 2004 Sep;60(3):757-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00226.x. Biometrics. 2004. PMID: 15339299
-
Quasilikelihood estimation in measurement error models with correlated replicates.Biometrics. 1996 Jun;52(2):401-11. Biometrics. 1996. PMID: 8672697
-
Robust techniques for measurement error correction: a review.Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Dec;17(6):555-80. doi: 10.1177/0962280207081318. Epub 2008 Mar 28. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008. PMID: 18375458 Review.
Cited by
-
Bayesian Semiparametric Density Deconvolution in the Presence of Conditionally Heteroscedastic Measurement Errors.J Comput Graph Stat. 2014 Oct 1;23(4):1101-1125. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2014.899237. J Comput Graph Stat. 2014. PMID: 25378893 Free PMC article.
-
Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019 Jun;26(6):R345-R368. doi: 10.1530/ERC-18-0309. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30965282 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.Magn Reson Med. 2013 Mar 1;69(3):891-902. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24324. Epub 2012 May 18. Magn Reson Med. 2013. PMID: 22611000 Free PMC article.
-
Categorizing a continuous predictor subject to measurement error.Electron J Stat. 2018;12(2):4032-4056. doi: 10.1214/18-EJS1489. Epub 2018 Dec 11. Electron J Stat. 2018. PMID: 31231451 Free PMC article.
-
Intake_epis_food(): An R Function for Fitting a Bivariate Nonlinear Measurement Error Model to Estimate Usual and Energy Intake for Episodically Consumed Foods.J Stat Softw. 2012 Mar 5;46(c03):1-17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v046.c03. J Stat Softw. 2012. PMID: 22837731 Free PMC article.