Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 May;4(3):347-51.
doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80226-9.

Skin closure at laparoscopy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Skin closure at laparoscopy

D M Rosen et al. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 May.

Abstract

Study objective: To discern the best method of wound closure after laparoscopy based on patient acceptability of pain, complications, and cosmetic result.

Design: Randomized, prospective study.

Setting: A university-affiliated hospital.

Patients: Fifty-four women. Interventions. The women received interrupted 3-0 nylon sutures, subcuticular 3-0 polyglactin 910 sutures, or adhesive strips for skin closure. At the umbilical port site the rectus sheath was closed with a single 0 polyglactin suture and then one of the three materials for skin closure. The lateral ports were closed with a combination of these materials, allowing each patient to act as her own control.

Measurements and main results: Pain was significantly less in wounds closed by subcuticular technique than in those closed by either transcutaneous suture or adhesive strips. This was seen for the 5-mm, 10-mm, and umbilical port sites. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of reported complications or patient satisfaction between subcuticular and transcutaneous wound sites.

Conclusion: We believe these results support subcuticular methods of wound closure after laparoscopic procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types