Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Jun;35(6):1348-52.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1348-1352.1997.

Detection of Treponema pallidum by a sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detection of Treponema pallidum by a sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR

A Centurion-Lara et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jun.

Abstract

Syphilis is diagnosed by serologic testing or by identification of the causative agent, Treponema pallidum. The bacterium has historically been detected in clinical specimens by dark-field microscopy, immunostaining with polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, or the rabbit inoculation test (RIT). RIT is considered to be very sensitive and specific, although it is available only in research settings and is not clinically useful due to the length of time required to obtain a result. In recent years, several PCR methods have been developed for the detection of T. pallidum, but none of these has shown a clear advantage in sensitivity over RIT. We have developed a specific and highly sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) that targets a 366 bp region of the 16S rRNA of T. pallidum. This RT-PCR can detect a single organism by Southern analysis when whole organisms are diluted and 10(-2) to 10(-3) T. pallidum organisms when RNA equivalents are used to make cDNA. The test was demonstrated to detect 10(-2) T. pallidum RNA equivalents in cerebrospinal fluid. Twenty different strains of T. pallidum, isolated from cerebrospinal fluids, aqueous humor, blood, and chancres, were shown to be detectable by this test. This efficient and sensitive technique could be more useful than existing methods for detecting very low numbers of organisms in clinical samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1488-91 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1469-73 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):180-3 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):49-54 - PubMed
    1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996 Oct 1;143(2-3):235-40 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data