Practice patterns among primary care physicians in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer
- PMID: 9165283
Practice patterns among primary care physicians in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer
Abstract
Background and objectives: Although patients with prostate disorders are frequently referred to urologists for diagnosis and management, primary care physicians (PCPs) are beginning to take a more active role. However, there is concern that PCPs are not optimally educated in the diagnosis and management of these disorders. This survey determined PCP practice patterns in evaluating and treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and screening for prostate cancer.
Methods: A 10-question survey was completed by 344 physicians attending various scientific meetings in 1995.
Results: Most PCPs (89%) indicated that up to 30% of their patients have symptomatic BPH, and a significant proportion of these are treated initially by the PCP. Although 61% of PCPs are aware of the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score and its recommended role in clinical practice guidelines, only 38% currently use it. Indications for using the AUA score include men with BPH symptoms (80%), men > 50 years (55%), and men with an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) (42%). The most popular BPH therapies are long-acting alpha blockers and watchful waiting. DRE is performed routinely by 84% of PCPs in men > 50 years, and annual serum prostate-specific antigen is routinely requested by 69% of PCPs.
Conclusions: Although PCPs play an increasing role in the diagnosis and management of prostate disorders, they are not taking full advantage of published clinical practice guidelines.
Similar articles
-
The American Urological Association symptom score in the evaluation of men with lower urinary tract symptoms: at 2 years of followup, does it work?J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1971-4. J Urol. 1996. PMID: 8618299
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation, treatment and association with sexual dysfunction: practice patterns according to physician specialty.Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Apr;62(4):614-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01699.x. Epub 2008 Feb 8. Int J Clin Pract. 2008. PMID: 18266709
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation and management by urologists and primary care physicians: practice patterns from the observational BPH registry.J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):971-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.081. Epub 2011 Jul 24. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21791352
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: an overview for primary care physicians.Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1740-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02534.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 21070524 Review.
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia: use of drug therapy in primary care.Geriatrics. 1998 Mar;53(3):24-8, 33-4, 37-40. Geriatrics. 1998. PMID: 9511773 Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness of a treatment protocol for male lower urinary tract symptoms in general practice: a practical randomised controlled trial.Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Dec;56(533):938-44. Br J Gen Pract. 2006. PMID: 17132382 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Attitudes of GP trainees towards the training received in urology on the GP training scheme.Ir J Med Sci. 2016 Feb;185(1):165-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-015-1261-1. Epub 2015 Feb 12. Ir J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 25673163
-
Tamsulosin dispensation patterns in the United States: a real-world, longitudinal, population claims database analysis.Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Aug;8(4):329-338. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.02. Transl Androl Urol. 2019. PMID: 31555556 Free PMC article.
-
The value of appropriate assessment prior to specialist referral in men with prostatic symptoms.Ir J Med Sci. 2009 Sep;178(3):281-5. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0337-1. Epub 2009 Apr 15. Ir J Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 19367426
-
The evaluation and treatment of prostate-related LUTS in the primary care setting: the next STEP.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Dec;14(6):595-605. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0371-4. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 24026361 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical