Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1997 May;17(3):176-87.

Options for renal replacement therapy: special considerations

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9165647
Review

Options for renal replacement therapy: special considerations

B N Becker et al. Semin Nephrol. 1997 May.

Abstract

The number of patients coming to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) continues to increase annually, challenging the existing system of renal replacement therapy. Moreover, these patients, on average, are older at the onset of ESRD and are living longer after the initiation of renal replacement therapy. The choice of modality of renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or transplantation) that is best suited for a particular patient is thus increasingly important. Important factors to consider include not only mortality and morbidity, but also quality of life, patient age and social circumstances, and the etiology of ESRD. Three ESRD patient populations in particular, diabetic patients, the elderly and the patients with HIV infection or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), present renal care providers with complex issues as to renal replacement therapy and outcomes. Motivated patients with available resources, no matter what their cause of ESRD, should be considered as excellent candidates for home hemodialysis. This modality of renal replacement therapy is associated with improved survival and quality of life when compared with other modes of dialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources