[Intestinal lavage solution for orthograde intestinal irrigation]

Abstract

Gut lavage by ingestion of large volumes of electrolyte solutions has been shown to be an effective method of cleansing the colon before colonoscopy, barium enema or surgery. Absorption of water and electrolytes, which might be hazardous to patients who are unable to readily excrete an additional sodium and/or water load, is prevented by addition of non-absorbable substances to the solutions, but systematic studies are lacking. We have evaluated the influence of three solutions for gut lavage with different electrolyte composition (sodium concentration 67 mmol/l and 125 mmol/l) and addition of different non-absorbable substances (mannitol and polyethylene glycol [PEG]) on water and electrolyte homeostasis and subjective tolerance, both in healthy volunteers and in patients before endoscopy of the colon. In a randomized, blind study 6 liters of the three solutions were administered via a nasogastric tube to 6 healthy volunteers during 4 hours (i.e. 1.5 l/h). Body weight, serum concentrations of sodium, potassium and of phosphate were measured before infusion of the solution and after the last rhythmic rectal effluent. No significant changes were observed in any of the studied parameters and the incidence of side effects (nausea, abdominal cramps) was comparable. In an additional clinical double blind study, 26 patients before diagnostic colonoscopy were asked to drink 4 liters of the gut lavage solutions as quickly as possible in order to clean out the colon. The time for drinking was significantly shorter in patients using the mannitol and low sodium solution (204 +/- 70 minutes) than in patients drinking the solution with polyethylene glycol and a high sodium concentration (387 +/- 137 minutes). There was a tendency to a longer drinking period in patients ingesting the solution with polyethylene glycol and low sodium (306 +/- 106 minutes). Thus, the acceptance for solutions containing polyethylenglycol and high sodium concentration is reduced because of low palatibility. Again no influence on serum electrolyte concentrations or body weight could be observed in any patient, the spectrum of side effects was similar and the cleansing effect of all three solutions was adequate. In conclusion solutions for gut lavage containing a balanced electrolyte concentration and nonresorbable substances such as mannitol or polythylenglycol are equivalent. However, solutions containing mannitol and a low sodium concentration are better tolerated by the patients but the use of mannitol is limited because of the risk of releasing explosive gases during interventional endoscopy. To enhance the acceptance and palatibility of solutions for gut lavage containing polethylenglycol the addition of flavoured substances is recommended.