Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Mar;86(3):196-203.
doi: 10.1007/s003920050051.

[Chemoreflex and baroreflex sensitivity in patients with survived sudden cardiac death]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Chemoreflex and baroreflex sensitivity in patients with survived sudden cardiac death]

[Article in German]
M Hennersdorf et al. Z Kardiol. 1997 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate patients with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death the analysis of ventricular late potentials, heart rate variability and baroreflexsensitivity is helpful. However, the prediction of malignant arrhythmic events cannot be performed with sufficient accuracy. For a better identification of high risk patients other methods are necessary. In this study the impact of the chemoreflexsensitivity for the prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was investigated.

Methods: Out of 44 patients included in the study, 23 were survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Seven patients suffered from sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias, 14 had no arrhythmic events in their prior history. For the investigation of the baroreflexsensitivity (BRS) systolic blood pressure was augmented by Norfenefrin (Novadral) and the resulting increase of RR-intervals was measured in the surface-ECG. For determination of the chemoreflexsensitivity (ChRS) the ratio of the RR-interval-shift and the blood pressure shift during a 5-min inhalation of oxygen with a nose mask was formed.

Results: Patients with aborted SCD showed significantly decreased values for the ChRS compared to those patients without an arrhythmic event in their prior history (2.49 +/- 1.86 vs. 6.75 +/- 6.79 mm Hg, p < 0.001). In contrast, for the BRS no significant differences could be found (5.23 +/- 3.95 vs. 5.34 +/- 3.10 mm Hg, p = n.s.). Patients with aborted sudden cardiac death and inducible tachyarrhythmias during the electrophysiologic study showed significantly lower values of BRS and ChRS compared to patients without inducibility.

Conclusion: As a new method for identification of patients with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death the analysis of chemoreflexsensitivity seems feasible and indicates an increased arrhythmic risk with a high sensitivity. The predictive impact has to be corroborated in larger patient collectives by prospect studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources