Management of esophageal perforations after therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
- PMID: 9175199
- DOI: 10.3109/00365529709025073
Management of esophageal perforations after therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Abstract
Background: Esophageal perforation is one of the most dreaded complications in therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the frequency of esophageal perforation after endoscopic procedures in a highly specialized endoscopy unit and compared clinical outcomes in patients undergoing either surgical or conservative management.
Methods: From January 1985 to June 1996, 1011 instrumental endoscopic procedures (dilatation and bougienage) were performed in our department. The computerized complication database was searched to identify all patients with esophageal perforation during this same period, and their records were reviewed.
Results: Seventeen esophageal perforations (1.7%) occurred in the course of 1011 procedures. Four perforations resulted from balloon dilatation, and 13 were secondary to bougienage. Six patients were managed surgically (35%), all of them recovering uneventfully. Eleven patients were managed conservatively, mainly because they were unfit for surgery. Survival rate in this group was 82%; only two patients died, both of whom had underlying malignant disease.
Conclusions: The current concept in management of esophageal perforations comprises surgical as well as medical treatment. In well-selected cases, non-operative treatment can be considered with favorable results.
Similar articles
-
Incidence, clinical management and outcomes of esophageal perforations after endoscopic dilatation.Z Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;45(11):1180-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963558. Z Gastroenterol. 2007. PMID: 18027320
-
Ruptures and perforations of the esophagus: the case for conservative supportive management.Ann Thorac Surg. 1978 Apr;25(4):346-50. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63554-0. Ann Thorac Surg. 1978. PMID: 637611
-
Full-thickness esophageal perforation after fluoroscopic balloon dilation: incidence and management in 820 adult patients.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):1115-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13614. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25905950
-
[Complications of elective esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGDS). Personal experience and literature review].G Chir. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(11-12):502-6. G Chir. 2009. PMID: 20109381 Review. Italian.
-
Modified Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Nonhealing Esophageal Anastomotic Leak: Technique Description and Review of Literature.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0318. Epub 2017 Oct 11. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018. PMID: 29019713 Review.
Cited by
-
Iatrogenic pharyngoesophageal perforations treated with fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (with video).Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):987-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3767-4. Epub 2014 Aug 23. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25149633
-
Esophageal perforation: principles of diagnosis and surgical management.Surg Today. 2006;36(4):332-40. doi: 10.1007/s00595-005-3158-5. Surg Today. 2006. PMID: 16554990
-
Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), partially covered SEMS and self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of benign esophageal ruptures and anastomotic leaks.BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb 29;12:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-19. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22375711 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Esophageal Perforation in Adults.Gastroenterology Res. 2010 Dec;3(6):235-244. doi: 10.4021/gr263w. Epub 2010 Nov 20. Gastroenterology Res. 2010. PMID: 27942303 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Successful treatment of cervical esophageal leakage by endoscopic-vacuum assisted closure therapy.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul 16;5(7):340-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i7.340. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23858378 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical