Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 May 22;264(1382):675-81.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0096.

Genetic and behavioural evidence of monogamy in a mammal, Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii)

Affiliations

Genetic and behavioural evidence of monogamy in a mammal, Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii)

P N Brotherton et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Little is known about the mating behaviour of monogamous mammals. Here, we present behavioural and genetic evidence of fidelity in a socially monogamous dwarf antelope, Kirk's dik-dik. DNA microsatellite analysis revealed no evidence of extra-pair paternity (EPP) in dik-diks: mothers' partners matched the paternal genotype in all 12 juveniles tested. One likely reason for the absence of EPP is that males guard their mates closely during oestrus and over-mark all female scent, thereby reducing the likelihood of other males attempting to mate. In addition, males may be limited in their ability to search for extra-pair populations (EPCs) by activities associated with pair-bond maintenance. Year-round, males maintained proximity within pairs, followed their females' activity patterns, and spent approximately 64% of their time with their partners. However, males did attempt to obtain EPCs when the opportunity arose, and genetic monogamy in dik-diks is probably best explained by the behaviour of females: in contrast to many monogamous female birds, female dik-diks do not appear to seek EPC partners. We propose that females avoid extra-pair males because they are unable to mate with them without instigating a potentially dangerous conflict.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67 - PubMed
    1. Z Tierpsychol. 1975 Aug;38(1):55-69 - PubMed
    1. Anim Genet. 1991;22(4):369-70 - PubMed
    1. Anim Genet. 1993 Apr;24(2):145 - PubMed
    1. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jan 22;263(1366):23-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources