Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Jun;86(6):577-82.
doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08937.x.

Randomized trial of high nutrient density formula versus standard formula in chronic lung disease

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized trial of high nutrient density formula versus standard formula in chronic lung disease

M S Fewtrell et al. Acta Paediatr. 1997 Jun.

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the nutrient intake and growth of infants with chronic lung disease would be improved by providing nutrients in more concentrated form, and that the lower volume would improve respiratory status, 60 preterm infants requiring supplemental oxygen at 28 days of age were randomly assigned a low-density (24 kcal/oz) formula fed at 180 ml/kg/day, or a high-density (30 kcal/oz) formula at 145 ml/kg/day. There was no difference in growth, respiratory outcome, oedema or diuretic requirement between dietary groups. Infants fed the high nutrient density formula had significantly greater total energy (143 vs 134 kcal/kg/day) and protein (3.9 vs 3.6 g/kg/day) intakes, largely because the low-density formula group did not achieve the designated 180 ml/kg/day. In conclusion, use of a high-density formula in infants with chronic lung disease did not improve growth or respiratory outcome, despite a small increase in total energy and protein intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources