Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1977 Nov;12(5):591-6.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.12.5.591.

Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine

Comparative Study

Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine

M S Silver et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Nov.

Abstract

Cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin, was compared in vitro with cephalexin and cephradine against 233 organisms. Evaluations were performed in Mueller-Hinton and nutrient broth and agar using two inoculum sizes. In agar, cefaclor had greater antibacterial activity than either cephalexin or cephradine against isolates of Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella typhi. All three drugs were relatively inactive against isolates of enterococci, Enterobacter species, and indole-positive Proteus. Cefaclor, however, did exhibit the greatest activity of the three antibiotics against these organisms. Although there was wide variability with respect to test parameters, the broth results generally paralleled the agar results. In nutrient broth a clear separation of the results with these three cephalosporins was seen with K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and S. typhi. Cefaclor was the most active, cephalexin had intermediate activity, and cephradine was the least active. From the data obtained in this in vitro study, it can be concluded that cefaclor, which has a substituted chloro group attached to the molecule, had increased antibacterial activity over cephalexin and cephradine. Comparative clinical trials with cefaclor will determine whether the differences outlined above are of clinical significance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Intern Med. 1965 Aug;63:199-211 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Mar;11(3):470-4 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Apr;3(4):488-97 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources