Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 May;47(418):275-9.

Guidelines for dyspepsia management in general practice using focus groups

Affiliations

Guidelines for dyspepsia management in general practice using focus groups

A P Hungin et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 May.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of published guidelines on managing dyspepsia in general practice. Existing guidelines emphasize the role of investigations and drugs rather than management approaches. Focus groups are a means of uncovering the way in which the participants think and work in the pragmatic-setting, and have not previously been formally used in creating guidelines.

Aim: To develop guidelines for the management of dyspepsia and to assess the use of focus groups of general practitioners (GPs) in order to do so.

Method: Initial evidence-based guidelines were proposed by a group of four GPs with an audit facilitator, and used for discussion in three focus groups using a standard format. An anthropological analysis of the proceedings led to modifications of the original guidelines, based on knowledge, perceptions and attitudes. The study was set in three distinct locations involving 30 GPs. The outcome measures consisted of feedback, categorized by types of responses, from the analysis of the focus groups and the creation of guidelines.

Results: The resulting guidelines were patient centred and based on the principles of good consultation. They encompassed patients' fears and doctors' clinical uncertainties, and allowed flexibility in the individual patient's management. The focus group methodology exposed a substantial number of GPs to guideline development, and had the added benefits of dissemination, peer review and educational challenge.

Conclusion: It was possible to develop guidelines for dyspepsia using focus groups. The methodology had the added benefits of ownership, peer review, exposure of educational gaps and locality factors, and dissemination of good practice. It included steps from evidence review to implementation strategies. The development of this technique could lead to a strategy towards the creation and application of evidence-based and professionally acceptable clinical guidelines and practice on a locality basis nationally.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br Med J. 1977 Nov 5;2(6096):1199-1201 - PubMed
    1. Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):328-34 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1979 Feb 17;1(6161):457-9 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1980 May 3;280(6223):1136-7 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1983 Mar 19;1(8325):632-4 - PubMed

Publication types