[Empirical Bayes estimates of relative risk: principles and examples]
- PMID: 9221443
[Empirical Bayes estimates of relative risk: principles and examples]
Abstract
Most atlases, such as cancer incidence or mortality atlases, show information for geographical subunits with major differences in population size. Under such conditions, classical epidemiological mapping indexes (SIR, SMR) are unsatisfactory. Regional pattern, if they exist, cannot be shown. Empirical Bayes methods produce smoothed relative risk estimators useful for solving this problem. We present some elementary principles of these methods using cancer incidence data in the French department of Isere.
Similar articles
-
Empirical Bayes adjustments for multiple results in hypothesis-generating or surveillance studies.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Sep;9(9):895-903. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000. PMID: 11008906
-
Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping.Biometrics. 1987 Sep;43(3):671-81. Biometrics. 1987. PMID: 3663823
-
[Detecting spatial autocorrelation of cancer risk when population density is heterogeneous].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1993;41(3):235-40. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1993. PMID: 8316691 French.
-
Empirical Bayes methods for stabilizing incidence rates before mapping.Epidemiology. 1994 Nov;5(6):622-30. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199411000-00010. Epidemiology. 1994. PMID: 7841244 Review.
-
Empirical-Bayes and semi-Bayes approaches to occupational and environmental hazard surveillance.Arch Environ Health. 1994 Jan-Feb;49(1):9-16. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1994.9934409. Arch Environ Health. 1994. PMID: 8117153 Review.
Cited by
-
Bootstrap investigation of the stability of disease mapping of Bayesian cancer relative risk estimations.Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):761-8. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036570.33081.fa. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 15469033