Retropubic cystourethropexy: is it an obstructive procedure?

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to establish whether colpocystourethropexy creates bladder outlet obstruction, as evaluated by pressure-flow studies.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 50 women. Preoperative evaluation included a detailed questionnaire, physical examination, urine culture, cystourethroscopy and multichannel urodynamic testing. Every patient underwent retropubic colpocystourethropexy according to the Tanagho modification of the original Burch technique. An average of 3 months after the operation clinical evaluation and identical multichannel urodynamic testing were repeated. Preoperative and postoperative urodynamic parameters were compared for each patient and statistical differences were established using Student's 2-tailed t test.

Results: No statistically significant difference was demonstrated in static urethral pressure profile parameters and in parameters during the filling phase of the cystometrogram except for cystometric capacity, which decreased after surgery (p = 0.02). In contrast, all 5 pressure-flow parameters analyzed (minimum urethral opening pressure, detrusor pressure at maximum flow, maximum flow, theoretical cross-sectional area and theoretical diameter of the flow rate controlling zone) showed statistically significant differences induced by surgery. Pressure-flow data reported on Schäfer's diagram and on the Abrams-Griffiths nomogram failed to demonstrate urodynamically significant obstruction created by surgery.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that colpocystourethropexy does not create obstruction but, rather, restores pressure-flow conditions to a normal or nearly normal level.