Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 May;13(3):157-70.
doi: 10.1023/a:1007387315948.

An algorithm for real-time, continuous evaluation of left ventricular mechanics by single-beat estimation of arterial and ventricular elastance

Affiliations

An algorithm for real-time, continuous evaluation of left ventricular mechanics by single-beat estimation of arterial and ventricular elastance

H Shih et al. J Clin Monit. 1997 May.

Abstract

We describe a computer algorithm that allows continuous, real-time evaluation of ventricular elastance (Ees), arterial elastance (Ea), and their coupling ratio in a clinical setting. In the conventional pressure-volume analysis of left ventricular (LV) contractility, invasive methods of volume determination and a significant, rapid preload reduction are required to generate Ees. With the help of automated border detection by transesophageal echocardiography, and a technique of estimating peak LV isovolumic pressure, Ea and Ees were determined from a single cardiac beat without the need for preload reduction. A comparison of results obtained by a conventional approach and the new algorithm technique, showed good correlation for Ea (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) and Ees (r = 0.74, p = 0.001). Bias analysis showed a bias (d) of 1.47 mmHg/cm2 for Ea with a standard deviation (SD) of 7.03 mmHg/cm2, and upper (d+2SD) and lower(d-2SD) limits of agreement of 15.24 mmHg/cm2 and -12.31 mmHg/cm2, respectively. Bias analysis showed a bias of -1.42 mmHg/cm2 for Ees with a SD of 4.88 mmHg/cm2, and limits of agreement of 8.15 mmHg/cm2 and -10.98 mmHg/cm2. The algorithm's stability to artifacts was also analyzed by comparing magnitudes of residuals of Ea and Ees from source signals with and without noise. With Ea differing by an average of 1.036 mmHg/cm2 and Ees differing by an average of 0.836 mmHg/cm2, the algorithm was found to be stable to artifacts in the source signals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980 Jun;27(6):299-305 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1986 Jun;250(6 Pt 2):R1021-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1981 Jun;63(6):1223-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Nov;40(5):748-53 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources