A reevaluation of the risk for venous thromboembolism with the use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy
- PMID: 9236553
A reevaluation of the risk for venous thromboembolism with the use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy
Abstract
Background: There are many health benefits associated with the use or oral contraceptives (OCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT), but these agents are also associated with potential health risks.
Objective: To reevaluate the current practice of withholding OCs or HRT in women with previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) by critically reviewing the evidence that the use of OCs or HRT is associated with an increased risk for VTE.
Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed to identify studies investigating associations between OCs and VTE or HRT and VTE. Each study was rated according to methodologic quality (level 1, low potential for bias; level 2, moderate potential for bias; level 3, high potential for bias). Results were combined across studies of similar design to determine pooled risk ratios for VTE. The results from studies investigating third-generation OCs were reported separately.
Results: For OC studies (n = 22), the pooled risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) in case-control studies, retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials were 3.0 (2.6-3.4), 4.8 (2.5-7.7), 2.4 (1.6-3.5), and 1.1 (0.4-2.9), respectively. In users of third-generation OCs, the pooled risk ratio (95% confidence interval) for VTE was 5.0 (2.5-7.5). No study was rated as level 1, 6 were rated as level 2, and 16 as level 3. Methodologic limitations in these studies would tend to exaggerate the risk for VTE with OC use. For HRT studies (n = 9), the pooled risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) in case-control studies, prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were 2.4 (1.7-3.5), 1.7 (1.0-2.9), and 0.7 (0.3-1.6), respectively. No study was rated as level 1, 6 were rated as level 2, and 3 as level 3.
Conclusions: First, an association between OC use and VTE is likely valid, but the reported risks are probably exaggerated. We estimate that users of non-third-generation OCs have a less than 3-fold increase in the risk for VTE compared with nonusers; the risk for VTE is possibly higher with the use of third-generation OCs. Second, an association between HRT use and VTE might exist; however, further investigation is required before definitive conclusions can be made.
Similar articles
-
Risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism with oral contraceptives containing norgestimate or desogestrel compared with oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel.Contraception. 2006 Jun;73(6):566-70. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Mar 29. Contraception. 2006. PMID: 16730485
-
Oral contraceptive use and venous thromboembolism: a consideration of the impact of bias and confounding factors on epidemiological studies.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1996 Mar-May;1(1):21-30. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1996. PMID: 9678134 Review.
-
The influence of thrombotic risk factors when oral contraceptives are prescribed. A control-only study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Mar;76(3):252-60. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997. PMID: 9093141
-
Thromboembolism during hormone therapy in Japanese women.Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005 Jun;31(3):272-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-872431. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005. PMID: 16052396
-
Oral contraceptives and thrombotic disease: risk of venous thromboembolism.Thromb Haemost. 1997 Jul;78(1):327-33. Thromb Haemost. 1997. PMID: 9198174 Review.
Cited by
-
Incidence and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism in Indian patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery: results of a prospective study.Postgrad Med J. 2006 Feb;82(964):136-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.034512. Postgrad Med J. 2006. PMID: 16461477 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-treatment of first unprovoked VTE.BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e011190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011190. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27154483 Free PMC article.
-
A tutorial on methods to estimating clinically and policy-meaningful measures of treatment effects in prospective observational studies: a review.Int J Biostat. 2011;7(1):6. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1285. Epub 2011 Jan 6. Int J Biostat. 2011. PMID: 22848188 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: methodological overview.PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e71813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071813. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23977151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis.BMJ. 2011 Feb 24;342:d813. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d813. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21349898 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
