This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 1997 Jul;177(1):248.

doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70478-2.

Do we really have a reproducible classification system for pelvic organ prolapse?

J Bernardes, A C Pereira

PMID: 9240619
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70478-2

Comment

Do we really have a reproducible classification system for pelvic organ prolapse?

J Bernardes et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul.

. 1997 Jul;177(1):248.

doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70478-2.

Authors

J Bernardes, A C Pereira

PMID: 9240619
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70478-2

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system.
Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC. Hall AF, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;175(6):1467-70; discussion 1470-1. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70091-1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8987926

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.