Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Jul;174(1):68-71.
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00027-5.

Management of choledocholithiasis in the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Affiliations

Management of choledocholithiasis in the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

J W Lorimer et al. Am J Surg. 1997 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The best way to detect and manage common duct stones in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not agreed upon at the present time.

Patients and methods: Our experience with choledocholithiasis in a consecutive series of 1,123 cholecystectomies (94% by laparoscopy) has been reviewed. Suspected duct stones were investigated preoperatively or postoperatively by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), and if necessary, duct clearance was attempted by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). No attempt was made to identify choledocholithiasis intraoperatively.

Results: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed in 11% of patients, and 32% of these required ES. The complication rate of ERC and ES was 8%, without mortality. Two patients required a second operation for missed choledocholithiasis, for a reoperation rate of 0.2%.

Conclusion: We believe that primary or secondary open surgery is only occasionally necessary for the management of choledocholithiasis. Preoperative ERC and ES for suspected duct stones, with the same strategy employed as a salvage for stones presenting after cholecystectomy, was safe and efficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources