Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Jul;74(1):83-7.
doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00086-9.

Long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotrophin protocol for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination treatment

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotrophin protocol for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination treatment

S Nuojua-Huttunen et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: This prospective study was undertaken to examine the usefulness of a long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a)/human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) protocol in intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment. The results were compared to those of clomiphene citrate (CC)/hMG/IUI.

Study design: Seventy-five patients were recruited to a GnRH-a/hMG group (group 1) while 88 patients underwent CC/hMG stimulation and served as controls (group 2). The study subjects were stimulated with a long GnRH-a/hMG regimen. IUI was performed 36 h after the administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin.

Results: The number of preovulatory follicles, the thickness of endometrium and sperm parameters were similar in both groups. The hMG requirements were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (21.2 +/- 5.1 vs. 8.1 +/- 3.1 ampoules). The pregnancy rate was 20% in group 1 and 12.5% in group 2, the difference being not significant.

Conclusion: The pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the GnRH-a/hMG/ IUI and CC/hMG/IUI groups. In addition, GnRH-a/hMG stimulation is notably more expensive than CC/hMG, and for these reasons, GnRH-a/hMG stimulation is not cost-effective in routine IUI therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources