Attention and distraction: effects on gut perception
- PMID: 9247458
- DOI: 10.1053/gast.1997.v113.pm9247458
Attention and distraction: effects on gut perception
Abstract
Background & aims: Paying attention to the gut may magnify perception of abdominal symptoms, but the actual influence of attention by anticipatory knowledge and distraction on gut perception remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to determine whether mental activity, attention vs. distraction, affects intestinal perception and whether mental effects are synergistic with other modulatory mechanisms.
Methods: Perception of 1-minute intestinal balloon distentions applied at 7-13-minute random intervals was measured in healthy subjects. First, distentions were tested during attention by anticipatory knowledge and during distraction (n = 8). Because somatic transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) reduces gut perception, distentions were then tested during attention alone, attention plus somatic TENS, and during distraction plus TENS (n = 8).
Results: Perception of intestinal distentions was higher during attention than during distraction (3.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.1 [mean +/- SEM]; P < 0.05). The area of somatic projection was greater during attention (P < 0.05). Intestinal compliance and oral reflex relaxation remained unchanged. During application of somatic TENS, perception of intestinal distention was higher during attention than distraction (2.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.2; P < 0.05). However, TENS did not alter the perception score during attention.
Conclusions: Mental activity may modulate gut perception and overrides the effects of somatic TENS on gut perception.
Comment in
-
Attention and distraction in pain experiments.Gastroenterology. 1998 Jun;114(6):1352-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70459-7. Gastroenterology. 1998. PMID: 9618661 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Perception and reflex responses to intestinal distention in humans are modified by simultaneous or previous stimulation.Gastroenterology. 1995 Dec;109(6):1742-9. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90739-4. Gastroenterology. 1995. PMID: 7498637
-
Somatic stimulation reduces perception of gut distention in humans.Gastroenterology. 1994 Dec;107(6):1636-42. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90802-8. Gastroenterology. 1994. PMID: 7958673
-
Selective dysfunction of mechanosensitive intestinal afferents in irritable bowel syndrome.Gastroenterology. 1995 Mar;108(3):636-43. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90434-4. Gastroenterology. 1995. PMID: 7875466 Clinical Trial.
-
Gastrointestinal perception: pathophysiological implications.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002 Jun;14(3):229-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00324.x. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002. PMID: 12061907 Review.
-
The effects of cranial TENS on measures of autonomic somatic and cognitive activity.Acupunct Electrother Res. 1989;14(1):29-42. doi: 10.3727/036012989816358551. Acupunct Electrother Res. 1989. PMID: 2568072 Review.
Cited by
-
Visceral sensation and emotion: a study using hypnosis.Gut. 2002 Nov;51(5):701-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.5.701. Gut. 2002. PMID: 12377810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hypersensitivity in functional gastrointestinal disorders.Gut. 2002 Jul;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i25-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_1.i25. Gut. 2002. PMID: 12077060 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cognitive modulation of the cerebral processing of human oesophageal sensation using functional magnetic resonance imaging.Gut. 2003 Dec;52(12):1671-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.12.1671. Gut. 2003. PMID: 14633941 Free PMC article.
-
The dysfunctional gut.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Aug;12(4):242-8. doi: 10.1007/s11894-010-0119-y. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010. PMID: 20582743 Review.
-
Food and hypersensitivity in functional dyspepsia.Gut. 2002 Jul;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_1.i50. Gut. 2002. PMID: 12077065 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources