Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography
- PMID: 9257072
- DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00236-x
Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography
Abstract
This article is a literature summary and annotated bibliography of research on recruitment for controlled clinical trials published through 1995. It extends and revises a similar review published in this journal a decade ago. The current commentary focuses on intervening developments in recruitment, including diverse populations, HIV trials, primary prevention trials, recruitment strategies, overall planning and management, patient and physician attitudes, adherence, generalizability, and cost. Profound barriers may exist in the recruitment of diverse populations, involving language, cultural factors, beliefs about medical research, and the appropriateness of available protocols. Extensive literature exists on patient and physician barriers to participation. Trials in HIV-infected or AIDs-diagnosed individuals introduce special considerations, including issues of confidentiality, parallel track design, and populations difficult to define and track. Recruitment strategies such as patient registries, occupational screening, direct mail, and the media are now prominent in the literature. Successful planning and management of an overall recruitment plan include piloting strategies, monitoring recruitment by data tracking systems, and hiring quality staff. Generalizability of study results is influenced by the characteristics of participants and by their adherence to study protocol. With increasingly limited funding to conduct clinical trials, efforts to quantify and reduce recruitment costs are being made. While over 4000 titles were identified, primarily by MEDLINE literature search, the articles summarized emphasize data-supported and -confirmed conclusions, and broad coverage of disease areas. We annotate here 91 outstanding articles useful for formulation of overall recruitment approaches in clinical trials.
Similar articles
-
Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Dec 6;87(23):1747-59. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995. PMID: 7473831 Review.
-
Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography.Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):6S-30S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90004-3. Control Clin Trials. 1987. PMID: 3326716 Review.
-
Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials.Cancer. 2007 Feb 1;109(3):465-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22436. Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17200964
-
Barriers and facilitators to participation of minorities in clinical trials.Ethn Dis. 2012 Spring;22(2):226-30. Ethn Dis. 2012. PMID: 22764647 Review.
-
A nurse's primer on recruiting participants for clinical trials.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Aug;29(7):1091-8. doi: 10.1188/02.ONF.1091-1098. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002. PMID: 12183757
Cited by
-
Successes and Challenges in Clinical Trial Recruitment: The Experience of a New Study Team.Med Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 14;12(3):39. doi: 10.3390/medsci12030039. Med Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39189202 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of recruitment methods utilized for a clinical trial with periodontal and diabetes enrollment criteria: the Diabetes and Periodontal Therapy Trial.Clin Investig (Lond). 2014 Dec 1;4(12):1065-1081. doi: 10.4155/cli.14.99. Clin Investig (Lond). 2014. PMID: 25574373 Free PMC article.
-
A knowledge base of clinical trial eligibility criteria.J Biomed Inform. 2021 May;117:103771. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103771. Epub 2021 Apr 1. J Biomed Inform. 2021. PMID: 33813032 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 7;11:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018. PMID: 30112460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):766-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12364308 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical