Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention
- PMID: 9258544
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1007369016717
Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms of percutaneous blood exposure (PCE) among doctors and discuss rational strategies for prevention. Data were obtained as part of a nation-wide questionnaire survey of occupational blood exposure among hospital employed doctors in Denmark. The doctors were asked to describe their most recent PCE, if any, within the previous 3 months. Detailed information on the instruments, procedures, circumstances and mechanisms that caused the PCE was obtained. Of 9375 doctors, 6256 (67%) responded, and 6005 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Of 971 described PCE the majority were caused by suture needles (n = 483), i.v.-catheter-stylets (n = 94), injection needles (n = 75), phlebotomy needles (n = 53), scalpels (n = 45), arterial blood sample needles (n = 41) and bone fragments (n = 23). Inattentiveness was the most common cause, contributing to 30.5% of all PCE. Use of fingers rather than instruments was a major cause of injury in surgical specialities and was a contributing cause of 36.9% PCE on suture needles. Common contributing causes when fingers were used (n = 199) were poor space in (30.2%) or view of (18.6%) the operation field. It was often argued that instruments were not practical to use or might harm the tissue. Of 689 PCE in surgical specialties, 17.4% were inflicted by colleagues. Up to 53.3% of PCE on hollow-bore needles could be attributed to unsafe routines like recapping only, but other mechanisms like sudden patient movements and 'acute situation' were common, especially in the case of PCE on i.v.-catheter-stylets. It is concluded that the exposure mechanisms of PCE reflect both unsafe routines, difficult working conditions and unsafe devices. Education in safer working routines are needed in all specialties. Introduction of safer devices should have a high priority in surgical specialties, and should be considered in non-surgical specialties too.
Similar articles
-
[Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish physicians. Mechanisms and prevention].Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Mar 16;160(12):1784-8. Ugeskr Laeger. 1998. PMID: 9536633 Danish.
-
Incidence and risk factors of occupational blood exposure: a nation-wide survey among Danish doctors.Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1007327031599. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997. PMID: 9062771
-
Occupational blood exposure among health care workers: II. Exposure mechanisms and universal precautions.Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25(2):199-205. doi: 10.3109/00365549309008485. Scand J Infect Dis. 1993. PMID: 8511514
-
Reducing needlestick and sharps injuries among healthcare workers.Nurs Stand. 2009 Feb 4-10;23(22):41-4. doi: 10.7748/ns2009.02.23.22.41.c6777. Nurs Stand. 2009. PMID: 19263961 Review.
-
A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies.J Hosp Infect. 2003 Apr;53(4):237-42. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1378. J Hosp Infect. 2003. PMID: 12660120 Review.
Cited by
-
Are we putting ourselves in danger? Occupational hazards and job safety for orthopaedic surgeons.J Orthop. 2021 Feb 20;24:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.023. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33716416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Prevalence of Accidental Needle Stick Injury and their Reporting among Healthcare Workers in Orthopaedic Wards in General Hospital Melaka, Malaysia.Malays Orthop J. 2014 Jul;8(2):6-13. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1407.009. Malays Orthop J. 2014. PMID: 25279086 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan;81(3):347-54. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0219-7. Epub 2007 Jul 10. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008. PMID: 17619897
-
Suture-TOOL: A suturing device for swift and standardized abdominal aponeurosis closure.Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Oct 5;11:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100137. eCollection 2022 Dec. Surg Pract Sci. 2022. PMID: 39845163 Free PMC article.
-
A literature-based cost-effectiveness analysis of device-assisted suturing versus needle-driven suturing during laparotomy closure.Hernia. 2025 Jan 23;29(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03266-2. Hernia. 2025. PMID: 39847140 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical