Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Jun;13(4):387-93.
doi: 10.1023/a:1007369016717.

Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention

Affiliations

Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanisms and strategies for prevention

S Nelsing et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms of percutaneous blood exposure (PCE) among doctors and discuss rational strategies for prevention. Data were obtained as part of a nation-wide questionnaire survey of occupational blood exposure among hospital employed doctors in Denmark. The doctors were asked to describe their most recent PCE, if any, within the previous 3 months. Detailed information on the instruments, procedures, circumstances and mechanisms that caused the PCE was obtained. Of 9375 doctors, 6256 (67%) responded, and 6005 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Of 971 described PCE the majority were caused by suture needles (n = 483), i.v.-catheter-stylets (n = 94), injection needles (n = 75), phlebotomy needles (n = 53), scalpels (n = 45), arterial blood sample needles (n = 41) and bone fragments (n = 23). Inattentiveness was the most common cause, contributing to 30.5% of all PCE. Use of fingers rather than instruments was a major cause of injury in surgical specialities and was a contributing cause of 36.9% PCE on suture needles. Common contributing causes when fingers were used (n = 199) were poor space in (30.2%) or view of (18.6%) the operation field. It was often argued that instruments were not practical to use or might harm the tissue. Of 689 PCE in surgical specialties, 17.4% were inflicted by colleagues. Up to 53.3% of PCE on hollow-bore needles could be attributed to unsafe routines like recapping only, but other mechanisms like sudden patient movements and 'acute situation' were common, especially in the case of PCE on i.v.-catheter-stylets. It is concluded that the exposure mechanisms of PCE reflect both unsafe routines, difficult working conditions and unsafe devices. Education in safer working routines are needed in all specialties. Introduction of safer devices should have a high priority in surgical specialties, and should be considered in non-surgical specialties too.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 May;13(5):265-71 - PubMed
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jul;76(4):281 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1992 Jun 3;267(21):2899-904 - PubMed
    1. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Jul;12(7):435-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Oct;117(10):1047-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources