Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse
- PMID: 9259056
- DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1
Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse
Abstract
American Heart Association as well as European Resuscitation Council require the carotid pulse check to determine pulselessness in an unconscious victim and to decide whether or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be initiated. Recent studies on the ability of health professionals to check the carotid pulse have called this diagnostic tool in question and led to discussions. To contribute to this discussion we performed a study to evaluate skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. A group of 449 volunteers (most had participated in a first aid course) were asked to check the carotid pulse in a young healthy, non-obese person by counting aloud the detected pulse rate. Time intervals until correct detection of the carotid pulse were registered. Overall the volunteers needed an average of 9.46 s, ranging from 1 to 70 s. Only 47.4% of the volunteers were able to detect a pulse within 5 s, and 73.7% within 10 s. A level of 95% volunteers detecting the pulse correctly was reached only after 35 s. Based on these findings we conclude that the intervals established for carotid pulse check may be too short and that perhaps the value of pulse check within in the scope of CPR needs to be reconsidered.
Similar articles
-
Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse.Resuscitation. 1996 Dec;33(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01016-7. Resuscitation. 1996. PMID: 9025126 Clinical Trial.
-
Competence of health professionals to check the carotid pulse.Resuscitation. 1998 Jun;37(3):173-5. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00055-0. Resuscitation. 1998. PMID: 9715777 Clinical Trial.
-
The carotid pulse check revisited: what if there is no pulse?Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11 Suppl):N183-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200011001-00002. Crit Care Med. 2000. PMID: 11098941 Clinical Trial.
-
[The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].Anaesthesist. 2006 Sep;55(9):958-66, 968-72, 974-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1064-x. Anaesthesist. 2006. PMID: 16915404 Review. German.
-
[Effectiveness of retraining after basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses: a literature review].Assist Inferm Ric. 2003 Apr-Jun;22(2):68-75. Assist Inferm Ric. 2003. PMID: 13677162 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Out-of-hospital management of unresponsive, apneic, witnessed opioid overdoses: a case series from a supervised consumption site.CJEM. 2022 Sep;24(6):650-658. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00326-9. Epub 2022 Jun 7. CJEM. 2022. PMID: 35670914
-
Cardiac output estimation using ballistocardiography: a feasibility study in healthy subjects.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):1671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52300-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38238507 Free PMC article.
-
2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 2: Adult basic life support.Resuscitation. 2005 Nov-Dec;67(2-3):187-201. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.09.016. Resuscitation. 2005. PMID: 16324988 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S466-515. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971093. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20956258 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Postgrad Med J. 2007 Oct;83(984):649-54. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057133. Postgrad Med J. 2007. PMID: 17916874 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical